A SENIOR Conservative has suggested Lord Frost was “acting as a bit of an outrider” for a potential leadership challenger to Boris Johnson due to the reasons he gave for his resignation.
It is the first suggestion a possible leadership challenge may be mounted in the near future against Johnson after insiders believe last week’s events - including the loss of the once-safe Tory seat of North Shropshire in a by-election - have left the Prime Minister “fatally wounded”.
Simon Hoare said he took Frost’s letter citing “the current direction of travel” of the Government, fears over “coercive” Covid measures and the wish for the UK to become a “lightly regulated, low-tax” economy, as the reasons for his departure at face value.
READ MORE: Downing Street panic as new tapes 'show ex aide quizzed on PM's private life'
But the MP for North Dorset and chair of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee told BBC Radio 4’s The World This Weekend that the issues were the same that had been raised by “at least one potential leadership candidate”.
And he said: “And I do just wonder whether he’s acting as a bit of an outrider for them, I’m just not sure.”
Hoare said while Frost’s resignation was a blow for Johnson, it was “not a hammer blow and certainly not a body blow”.
Frost will leave his post immediately. He is understood to have handed his resignation to the prime minister earlier this month, but was persuaded to stay on until January.
The Brexit minister formally tendered his resignation in a letter expressing concerns about the government’s “direction of travel.”
READ MORE: Brexit: Is Lord Frost's resignation good news for UK-EU relations?
Lord Frost wrote: “You know my concerns about the current direction of travel. I hope we will move as fast as possible to where we need to get to: a lightly regulated, low-tax, entrepreneurial economy, at the cutting edge of modern science and economic change.
“Three hundred years of history show that countries which take that route grow and prosper, and I am confident we will too.”
He also expressed his concerns about the Covid-19 crisis after more than 100 Tories MPs rebelled against the government to protest against the introduction of “plan B” measures.
“We also need to learn to live with Covid and I know that is your instinct too,” he wrote.
“You took a brave decision in July, against considerable opposition, to open up the country again. Sadly, it did not prove to be irreversible, as I wished, and believe you did too. I hope we can get back on track soon and not be tempted by the kind of coercive measures we have seen elsewhere.”
Johnson last night praised Frost for helping to “maximise the economic and political opportunities for Brexit.”
The Prime Minister added in a letter to Frost: “You have helped highlight and sought to address the destabilising impact of the current operation of the Northern Ireland protocol is having on communities in Northern Ireland, which is undermining the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement.”
After Frost’s resignation Nadine Dorries, the culture secretary, was removed from a Conservative WhatsApp group after defending the Prime Minister.
Frost’s departure came at the end of a terrible week for Johnson. There was a damaging backbench rebellion over pandemic regulations, the by-election defeat, more revelations about lockdown-breaking parties in Downing Street, and a fresh Covid crisis.
Frost dropped a heavy hint of his dissatisfaction with Johnson’s policies in a speech last month.
In it, he expressed concern the government was not taking advantage of the 'freedom' given by Brexit to chart a new political course, cutting taxes and reducing regulation.
“We can’t carry on as we were before,” he said. “And if after Brexit all we do is import the European social model, we will not succeed.”
Before the news of his departure broke, in The Mail on Sunday, it was already understood that Iain Duncan Smith was being lined up for a prominent job to placate the increasingly restive right-wing of the Conservative Party.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel