MINISTERS in Scotland and Wales have jointly condemned the “barbaric” measures in the UK Government’s Nationality and Borders Bill – as well as warning the legislation may need approval from the parliaments in Edinburgh and Cardiff.
Scottish Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison (below) and her Welsh counterpart Jane Hutt have written a joint letter to Home Secretary Priti Patel to demand the UK reconsiders its “hostile environment strategy” and develops “sufficient safe and legal routes” for asylum seekers.
And they are calling for Patel to have talks with them before the end of the year, as they have been “no ministerial meetings in relation to these matters”.
The letter comes after 27 people lost their lives trying to cross the Channel in November – a journey which has resulted in 166 people being recorded as either dead or missing since 2014.
The Nationality and Borders Bill – which cleared the Commons on Monday – seeks to curb these crossings and also change how asylum claims are processed.
It has been branded the "anti-refugee bill" by campaigners, as it seeks to penalise entering the UK through unofficial means.
This is incompatible with the 1951 Refugee Convention, to which the UK is a signatory.
READ MORE: Here are the five cruellest parts of the UK Nationality and Borders Bill
Both the Scottish and Welsh governments have expressed “far-reaching concerns about the impact of the provisions” in the bill to the Home Secretary.
Robison and Hutt stated: “This legislation contains measures that will prevent migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats, including the barbaric suggestions for ‘push-back’ exercises involving enforcement officials seeking to repel small boats.
“Rather than help matters, these measures will delay rescues and endanger lives.”
The Scottish and Welsh politicians told Patel this contradicts the UK’s “obligation under maritime laws and conventions to guarantee people’s safety”.
The two make clear their governments “do not believe that increased marine or beach patrols, diversion, criminalisation, changes to legal status or reduced support to those who arrive in the UK” will deter people from seeking to enter the UK.
They also told the Home Secretary: “Scotland and Wales have always played their part in providing sanctuary to those fleeing conflict and persecution and we stand ready to do so again.”
Meanwhile, Welsh Ministers have now decided that a Legislative Consent Memorandum is required at the Senedd in relation to some clauses in the bill.
Under the devolution settlement, such consent is needed where UK legislation touches on areas for which the devolved administrations are responsible – although Westminster in the past has pushed ahead with new laws without such approval.
Scottish ministers “still require urgent clarity from the Home Office to ascertain whether similar legislative competence issues need to be addressed in Scotland”, the letter adds.
READ MORE: Priti Patel's 'anti-refugee' bill could erode devolution, legal expert warns
A Home Office Spokesperson said: “The Nationality and Borders Bill, which has revived its third reading in Parliament, will deliver the most comprehensive reform in decades to fix the broken asylum system.
“It will make the system fairer and more effective so that we can better protect and support those in genuine need of asylum.
“The UK has a proud history of welcoming those in need of protection, and we continue to do all we can to provide asylum seekers with the safe, secure accommodation they deserve.
“This includes continued joint working across the UK, and we urge everyone to step up and play their part.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel