DESPITE Westminster being embroiled in a sleaze row amid the Owen Paterson scandal, a Conservative MP has taken on a third job earning a £60,000 a year salary on top of his parliamentary earnings.
Stephen McPartland registered the £5000 per month role for consultancy work for the London-based global investment company MBU Capital Group, according to the register of members’ financial interests.
It's despite a heated row over MPs second jobs in the wake of the Paterson lobbying row in which the Tory MP broke parliamentary rules.
Paterson was found to have acted inappropriately after lobbying for two companies he was a paid consultant for.
Despite the scandal, parliamentary records show McPartland's own firm McPartland Consulting Ltd is gaining £60k per year on top of his £82k salary as a member of parliament “for providing strategic advice on expanding geographically into untackled markets and increasing investment activities through a risk adjusted platform. Hours: up to 8 hours a month”.
According to its website, MBU focuses on “natural resources, education, cannabis/CBD, and real estate”.
READ MORE: Revealed: Seven Scottish Tory MSPs raking in cash from second jobs
Despite previously vowing that being an MP would be his full-time job, the Tory MP also works 10 hours per month as a non-executive director for the retailer Furniture Village, for which he earns £4,166.67 a month.
McPartland started work for Furniture village in 2014, originally earning around £3700 a month from his work.
In 2010, McPartland told his voters: “If I became Stevenage's MP, I would treat it as a full-time job.”
The MP was previously accused of betraying his voters in 2015 by Labour after he earned more than £70,000 from a string of jobs.
Before being elected as a member of parliament, the English politician previously worked for the lobbying firm BritishAmerican Business.
The two extra jobs mean McPartland takes home £110,000 per year on top of his salary for being an MP.
The issue has caused a debate around politicians' second jobs, with a number of MPs and MSPs making up hundreds of thousands of pounds every year on top of their official salary.
A recent Survation poll found that 68% of people in the UK think MPs should not be allowed to take on paid work outside parliament.
READ MORE: 'I don't know why I did that': Douglas Ross on failing to declare £28,000
McPartland joins several of his Conservative colleagues to face scrutiny over second and third jobs, including Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross.
In November The Herald found that the MP and MSP failed to declare more than £28,000 in earnings.
The Moray MP and Highlands and Islands region MSP made nearly £7000 from refereeing 16 football matches from October 2020 to January 2021 but did not record that income in the register of interests. He also did not declare his Holyrood salary of £21,000.
Ross said the omissions were a “genuine mistake”, adding: “This was an error on my behalf that shouldn’t have happened, and I apologise for not registering these payments on time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel