MATT Hancock has apologised for the kissing scandal which led to his removal from government – but denied allegations of wrongdoing over his former pub landlord’s bumper Covid contract.
The former UK health secretary says his romantic embrace with his aide Gina Coladangelo, which was captured on CCTV in his departmental office, has "blown up every part of my life”.
The Tory MP, who did not immediately resign when the story broke in June, spoke about the kissing scandal on ITV’s Peston show.
He was also told he was talking "a load of rubbish” after denying involvement in his friend's lucrative public deal during the early stages of the pandemic.
Asked about his resignation, Hancock said: "As you can imagine, the first thing that I focused on was my personal life and when I focused on my professional responsibility I decided that I had to resign."
READ MORE: REVEALED: Sajid Javid's bumper share options in firm linked to health sector
He continued: "I'd blown up every part of my life. I concentrated on my personal life first as you can probably imagine ... I made the decision.
"It was clearly the right decision. I just say sorry again for the failure. I let a lot of people down. I'm sorry to the people that I hurt."
The backbencher also came under scrutiny over questions about his involvement in helping his friend, the former landlord of his local pub, to obtain a £40 million contract to supply test tubes for NHS Covid-19 testing.
“I have been told through the media… that somehow there’s been some great scandal here and it’s just not true”
— Peston (@itvpeston) December 1, 2021
Former Health Secretary @MattHancock insists he had nothing to do with the contract in which his constituent was awarded £40m off government work.
#Peston pic.twitter.com/OjTRKBhGvj
The Mail on Sunday, following a contested Freedom of Information request, obtained messages between Hancock and Alex Bourne in which he personally referred a plea for business to Jonathan Marron, at the time the director-general of community and social care at the Department of Health.
A message from Bourne, who runs a food packaging company, initially raised the possibility of making personal protective equipment (PPE) such as surgical facemasks, before later exchanges reveal a switch to producing items involved in coronavirus testing.
Bourne said his firm had signed a contract with an approved NHS distributor rather than directly with the Government and added: “This idea that I am chummy with [Hancock] is not true.”
READ MORE: Matt Hancock has not been offered a book deal, publisher says
Hancock told Peston: "I've absolutely no idea because I didn't have anything at all to do with that contract.
"And more importantly, the gentleman in question and his company didn't get a contract with the department or the NHS. They were a subcontractor and therefore they didn't have a contractual arrangement with the department ... I have been told, through the media and outlets, that somehow there has been some great scandal here, and it's just not true.
"I had nothing to do with this contract, and there isn't a contract between my constituent and the department. He was a subcontractor.”
However, Labour MP Jess Phillips branded Hancock’s explanation “a load of rubbish”.
“What an absolute load of rubbish... Did anyone else’s friends get contracts?”
— Peston (@itvpeston) December 1, 2021
Watch @JessPhillips and @MattHancock disagree over the handling of PPE contracts during the pandemic.
#Peston pic.twitter.com/RGQTvD2IPq
She told Peston: “Did anyone else’s friends get a contract?
“Mine didn’t, none of my friends are on those lists.”
She continued: “There were PPE providers in my constituency that had lorries driving in from Italy to take it when I was trying to get through on those lines that were given to Members of Parliament and so I watched lorries take personal protective equipment in lorries out of my constituency while my care homes were ringing me asking if I could go to the local school to borrow goggles.”
The Birmingham Yardley MP added: “I was having endless phone calls, we were having those phone calls with the Cabinet Office.
“It’s funny because they were already a provider. However, some people’s friends, who weren’t providers, somehow managed to get through the line.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel