THE French president, Emmanuel Macron, has launched a scathing attack on Boris Johnson amid an escalating war of words over who shoulders the blame for the deaths of people attempting to cross the Channel.
Home Secretary Priti Patel had been due to meet with her counterpart in France, Gerald Darmanin, to discuss the crisis after 27 people died trying to cross the strait earlier this week.
However, a letter sent from Johnson to Macron, which the Prime Minister shared on Twitter, sparked a diplomatic dispute that led to the unilateral cancellation of that meeting.
In the letter, Johnson called on Macron to accept a bilateral agreement that “all illegal immigrants who cross the Channel” should be returned from the UK to France.
My letter to President Macron. pic.twitter.com/vXH0jpxzPo
— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) November 25, 2021
The letter, and Johnson’s sharing it on social media, was greeted with “surprise” in France.
Speaking to press, President Macron hit out at the British Prime Minister, saying he should not communicate through Twitter.
He also appeared to echo calls from Nicola Sturgeon to address the root causes of the refugee crises, ensuring that people don’t need to leave their homes at all.
Macron said: “If the matter was simple, it would have been solved. It isn't.
“For these women and men who leave poverty and struggle behind and try to reach the United Kingdom, they do not want to stay in France, they want to cross [the Channel] at all costs.
READ MORE: Priti Patel's stance on refugees shows she has not accepted the reality
“Therefore the proper answer lies in a serious cooperation in order to prevent those movements, to dismantle the trafficking rings and avoid those men and women arriving in our country [France] because it is already too late when they're here.
“I have talked with the Prime Minister a couple of days ago, in a serious manner, and I intend to keep working with all the countries and their leaders.
“I am surprised when methods are not serious. One does not communicate on those issues, from one leader to another, via tweets or by a letter made public. We are not whistle-blowers. Come on now.”
Emmanuel Macron sur la lettre de Boris Johnson: "Je suis surpris des méthodes quand elles ne sont pas sérieuses, on ne communique pas par tweets" pic.twitter.com/2rkDtSiCRe
— BFMTV (@BFMTV) November 26, 2021
Macron closed by saying that they and other European nations would work with the British if they “decide to behave seriously”.
The National's translator said that Macron's tone was "gold" and described the speech as an expertly written "soft attack".
In a statement reported on French media, the Interior Ministry said the meeting on Sunday would go ahead with interior minister Gerald Darmanin and his counterparts from Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany and representatives of the European Commission.
A French government spokesperson said Johnson's letter did not "correspond at all” with discussions Johnson and Macron had when they spoke on Wednesday.
“We are sick of double-speak,” the spokesperson added.
The news follows the French foreign minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian, branding Boris Johnson a "populist who uses all elements at his disposal to blame others for problems he faces internally”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel