WHAT’S THE STORY?
AMERICAN space agency Nasa yesterday launched at 1.21am Eastern Standard Time a rocket called DART, which stands for Double Asteroid Redirection Test.
It is the world’s first full-scale mission to test technology for defending Earth against potential asteroid or comet hazards, and was launched aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Space Launch Complex 4 East at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.
DART will travel for 10 months and 11m kms to a double asteroid to show, as Nasa stated, “that a spacecraft can autonomously navigate to a target asteroid and intentionally collide with it – a method of deflection called kinetic impact”.
They are targeting a near-Earth double asteroid known as Didymos and Dimorphos, with the latter being a “moonlet” estimated to be about 160 metres in size. It has been chosen because it is a good test object, and not one that is actually expected to collide with Earth.
Scientists estimate the kinetic impact will shorten Dimorphos’ orbit around Didymos by several minutes. Researchers will precisely measure that change using telescopes on Earth.
WASN’T THAT A MOVIE PLOT?
CLOSE. The 1998 film Armageddon featured a team of drillers landing on an asteroid heading for Earth and then blowing it up with a nuclear bomb.
By comparison, Nasa DART merely wants to land a gentle punch on Dimorphos to prove the deflection concept is viable.
DO WE REALLY NEED THIS MISSION?
THE cynics may say it is a huge and expensive – £250m – PR stunt by Nasa, but the chances of an asteroid hitting Earth are higher than you might think and the human species really does have to think about what to do if an asteroid collision becomes inevitable – and we should get plenty warning if that is going to happen.
Experts say that thousands of tiny particles strike the Earth every year, mostly burning up in the atmosphere as meteors, but some make it through and become meteorites if they land.
We know that very large meteorites, possible the remains of comets or asteroids, have struck the Earth before, most famously the impact which wiped out the dinosaurs 66 millions years ago and which goes by the catchy name of the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) extinction event.
That event was caused by a comet or asteroid about six to nine miles wide landing somewhere around the Gulf of Mexico. As much as 75% of all species on Earth died as a result of the planet being effectively suffocated.
As recently as 2013 the Chelyabinsk Event in Russia saw a rock roughly the size of a six-storey building break up with massive explosions which had the force of approximately 20 to 30 Hiroshima bombs, injuring 1200 people and causing around £25m worth of damage. But that event was very rare, and there are no records of anyone other than one American woman being struck by a meteorite.
On November 30, 1954, Ann Hodges was injured by a meteorite that crashed through the roof of her home in Sylacauga, Alabama. It struck a radio, and then hit Hodges on her hip.
Michael Reynolds, a Florida State College astronomer and an author on a book about meteorites, states: ”You have a better chance of getting hit by a tornado and a bolt of lightning and a hurricane all at the same time.”
Good odds, then.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here