THE UK Prime Minister has been urged to meet with representatives of Valneva to understand the “inexplicable” decision to cancel their Covid vaccine contract by the MP for Livingstone, where the biotech company has a manufacturing site.
Speaking at Prime Ministers Questions on Wednesday, the SNP's Hannah Bardell called on Boris Johnson to meet with her and finally resolve the cancellation of the vaccine contract, which took place three weeks before positive clinical trial results were announced.
To date, no reason has been given for the cancellation and no apology offered following an inaccurate statement issued in the House of Commons which caused distress to clinical trial participants and commercial damage to the company.
READ MORE: Jobs at Valneva's Livingston site 'at risk' after UK cancelled deal in 'bad faith'
The former chair of the UK’s vaccine taskforce, Dame Kate Bingham, suggested the UK Government “acted in bad faith” when it cancelled the 100 million inactivated Covid vaccines set to be produced by Valneva.
Bardell said: “The UK Government’s inexplicable decision to cancel Valneva’s contract, which would have delivered 100 million Covid vaccines, has left their workforce extremely apprehensive about the future.
“Boris Johnson made great play when he visited Valneva earlier this year – posing for pictures and talking up the UK’s vaccine rollout. He must now put his money where his mouth is and back this workforce in my Livingston constituency. New hires were made to support the UK’s order – and after his decision a new state-of-the-art, and much needed, vaccine manufacturing plant lies unfinished.
“I gave the Prime Minister an opportunity today to apologise for the lack of transparency on this issue – he failed to do so.
“Although I was pleased to see him commit to a discussion in person, I will not rest until the record is straight.
“The workforce at Valneva deserve transparency, and I will not stop until they have it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel