POLICE have been asked to investigate “cash for honours” allegations linked to Conservative Party peerage appointments to the House of Lords.
SNP Commons leader Pete Wishart has written to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick to raise “potential criminal misconduct regarding the procurement of honours and membership of the House of Lords”.
He wants the probe to focus on an Open Democracy and Sunday Times investigation which, among other claims, found nine of the party’s former treasurers have been elevated to the House of Lords since the Conservatives returned to power in 2010.
In his letter, Wishart added: “In total, 22 of the Conservative Party’s biggest financial contributors have been made members of the House of Lords in the past 11 years.
READ MORE: Owen Paterson scandal: Boris Johnson slammed as 'tin pot dictator' as he skips debate
“Together they have donated some £54 million to the Tories.
“I believe that it is only right to investigate whether these donations were, in fact, rewarded with honours.”
The Tories have denied any link between the donations and the nominations to sit in the Lords.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Wishart said: “The true shocker of the past couple of days is cash for honours 2.0. “I really didn’t think that following Tony Blair being questioned under caution by the Metropolitan Police 15 years ago we’d be back to this place so quickly.
“That was only a couple of parliaments ago that Tony Blair had to face questions about donations to the House of Lords.
“The only difference I’ve seen in the course of the past couple of decades is the price to get into the House of Lords has gone up from £1 million from New Labour to £3 million from the Conservatives.
“There’s Tory inflation for you.
“It now seems that nearly all the past treasurers of the Conservative Party of later years are in that place, wearing their ermine, taking a part in the legislative decisions of this country.
“The only characteristic they seem to have, the only defining feature that seems to get them a place in that House, is the fact they’re able to give several million pounds to this Government.”
On Sunday, Environment Secretary George Eustice said: “They are philanthropists who give huge amounts to charity, who have been very successful in business and, therefore, on those grounds ought to be considered for the Lords.”
But Wishart said: “I think the public will probably assess that the accounts of the Conservative Party is just about the worst and least deserving good cause that there in this land.”
READ MORE: Sleaze-hit Boris Johnson loses UK opinion poll lead over Labour
He labelled the House of Lords a “receptacle for donors” of either Labour or the Tories.
Wishart went on: “I have asked the Metropolitan Police to investigate these appointments under the provisions of section 1, subsection 2 of the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925.
“That Act states that if any person gives, or agrees or proposes to give, or offers to any person any gift, money or valuable consideration as an inducement or reward for procuring or assisting or endeavouring to procure the grant of a dignity or title of honour to any person, or otherwise in connection with such a grant, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanour.
“I have now asked the Metropolitan Police to investigate the activities of the Conservative Party and the awarding of places in the House of Lords.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel