LIBERAL Democrat chief whip Wendy Chamberlain has blasted the UK Government for its conduct over the Owen Paterson sleaze scandal.
Speaking during an emergency debate on the issue, Chamberlain said it was the type of behaviour that happens in "Moscow" or "Beijing", not in the House of Commons.
She said: “This is almost the kind of behaviour we would expect to see in the Duma in Moscow, National People’s Congress in Beijing, not in the House of Commons.
“Previous prime ministers and previous governments have all had their failings, but it’s a long time since we have seen these issues and the absolute lack of resolve to do anything about it.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson to skip Commons grilling on Tory sleaze scandal
“They say a fish rots from the head down, and I’m disappointed to see that the Prime Minister has chosen not to turn up to today to answer questions, given that the leader of the opposition is in his place.
“You can’t help but feel that he thinks the rules don’t apply to him.”
The LibDems, who secured the debate, have called for a statutory public inquiry into sleaze and corruption allegations.
The inquiry, which would have the power to summon witnesses and take evidence under oath, would examine not only the Paterson row but also the awarding of coronavirus contracts, whether Johnson’s holidays in villas provided by friends were properly declared, and how the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat was funded.
Intervening, Labour’s Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Slough) branded the Prime Minister a “tin-pot dictator who himself is now mired in sleaze”.
His words prompted the a rebuke from the Speaker, who said: “Please moderate language, moderate thoughts, let’s do this right.”
Cabinet Office minister Steve Barclay said he and his colleagues on the Government frontbench “regret” the “mistake” they made last week over the issue of standards.
He told MPs: “I’d like, first and foremost, to express my regret and that of my ministerial colleagues over the mistake made last week.
“We recognise there are concerns across the House over the standards system and also the process by which possible breaches of the code of conduct are investigated.
“Yet whilst sincerely held concerns clearly warrant further attention, the manner in which the Government approached last week’s debate conflated them with the response to an individual case.
“This House shares a collective interest in ensuring that the code of conduct reflects and fosters the highest standards of public life.
“The Government fully recognises that the standards committee is critical to this, including the important role performed by its chairman (Labour MP Chris Bryant).”
MPs asked why the Prime Minister was not in attendance at a Commons debate on MPs’ standards.
READ MORE: Sleaze-hit Boris Johnson loses UK opinion poll lead over Labour
Chamberlain added: “This is a Prime Minister who flew to Afghanistan to escape a vote on Heathrow when he was foreign secretary, and has driven to the North East to escape questions today.”
A shout of “Run, Boris, Run!” came from the opposition benches.
She added: “There are many questions that demand answers and many of those involve the Prime Minister’s personal role in this affair.
“A Prime Minister who has been under investigation more than any other member in recent years, and the question is: who stands to benefit from getting the current standards processes out of the way?
“Members of the public will have to draw their own conclusions on that with the Prime Minister not being here today.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel