A SENIOR BBC reporter has broken down live on air as he described the devastating hunger crisis taking hold in Afghanistan.
The country was abandoned to the Taliban by Western forces in August. Civil liberties have since been brutally repressed, with vital infrastructure crumbling, prompting demands for Boris Johnson to increase UK aid.
The BBC's foreign affairs editor John Simpson is in Bamiyan, central Afghanistan.
His voice trembled as he gave grim details about the humanitarian disaster, which has been compounded by colder winter weather and droughts.
The World Food Programme is currently struggling to provide food to 22 million people, with acute hunger and famine expected over the winter if conditions do not improve.
Simpson, speaking to BBC Radio 4, recounted meeting a widowed mother of seven in a cave near the site of the Bamiyan Statues, which have been destroyed by the Taliban.
He explained her only source of funds, gained from weeding crop fields, has been lost since the Taliban takeover as the local farmer can no longer afford to pay her.
“She’s got no money, she’s having to beg for fuel to make a fire and beg for flour, which used to be delivered under the old government before the Taliban came in,” Simpson said.
I’m in Bamyan in central Afghanistan & have just interviewed a widow with 7 young children. They’re facing starvation. This area has thousands of poor people threatened by famine. Yet a payment of £200,000 would ensure that every single one of them gets through the winter.
— John Simpson (@JohnSimpsonNews) November 8, 2021
He became emotional as he added: “Looking round at those kids, I all … eh … it was quite difficult.
“I’m sorry to … you know I’ve seen a lot of bad things in my time but this was … it hasn’t yet happened but you know it’s just around the corner – and they know it.”
"It hasn't yet happened, but you know it's just around the corner"
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) November 8, 2021
The BBC's Foreign Affairs Editor, John Simpson, breaks down describing a family facing starvation in Afghanistan#R4Today https://t.co/v2gQ8BfFWq pic.twitter.com/CUNcktvky1
Simpson interviewed UN world food programme executive director, David Beasley, and asked what he would say to the world’s richest people as the crisis in Afghanistan unfolds.
“To the world leaders, to the billionaires, imagine if this was your little girl, or your little boy, or your grandchild about to starve to death. You would do everything you possibly could,” he replied.
“And when there’s $400 trillion of wealth in the world today – shame on us that we let any child today die from hunger. Shame on us, I don’t care where that child is.”
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford, responding to Simpson’s emotional report, renewed calls for the UK Government to step up support to the Afghan people.
Last month at Prime Minister’s Questions, he warned the humanitarian situation in the country following the Taliban takeover was “dire”.
"Given the history of the last 20 years, it should be obvious that we have a deep responsibility to this country and to its people,” Blackford said in the Commons. “They are dying and they need our help.”
I warned @BorisJohnson about this two weeks ago at Prime Ministers Questions. Our withdrawal from Afghanistan has consequences. We have a moral responsibility to get humanitarian support to the people in Afghanistan. https://t.co/It6XYeYSkn
— Ian Blackford (@Ianblackford_MP) November 8, 2021
Posting on Twitter in response to Simpson, the SNP MP added: “I warned @BorisJohnson about this two weeks ago at Prime Ministers Questions. Our withdrawal from Afghanistan has consequences. We have a moral responsibility to get humanitarian support to the people in Afghanistan.”
Speaking in the Commons last month, Johnson said that the UK Government had doubled its in-year aid commitment to £286m, but added: "What we can't do at the moment is write a completely blank cheque to the Taliban government, Taliban authorities, we need to ensure that that country does not slip back into being a haven for terrorism and a narco-state."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel