A CABINET minister has been criticised by Tory MPs after claiming the Owen Paterson sleaze row was a “storm in a teacup”.
George Eustice’s comments were branded “unhelpful” and “complete nonsense” in a sign of the anger on the party benches over the handling of the Paterson case.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer claimed Boris Johnson was trying to undermine Westminster’s standards watchdogs because of his own run-ins with the authorities.
MPs will gather in the Commons on Monday for an emergency debate on the Paterson case and other allegations of Westminster sleaze.
READ MORE: SNP demand police investigation into Tory 'cash for honours' scandal
Former Cabinet minister Paterson was facing a 30-day suspension for an “egregious” breach of lobbying rules after an investigation by Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Kathryn Stone and a subsequent report by the Commons Committee on Standards.
The Government had ordered Conservative MPs not to back Paterson’s immediate suspension last Wednesday but to support the creation of a Tory-led committee to look again at the case and overhaul the standards system.
Ministers backed down following a backlash, prompting Mr Paterson to quit the Commons on Thursday.
Eustice acknowledged the Government had “made a mistake” but told Sky News: “What we have seen is a Westminster storm in a teacup.”
But High Peak MP Robert Largan, one of the new generation of Tory MPs elected in 2019, criticised Eustice’s attempt to downplay the row, telling Times Radio: “I don’t think it’s very helpful to say, ‘oh, it’s just a storm in a teacup’.
“In my view this was something that we got badly wrong and they need to fix it.”
Another Tory MP elected in 2019 told the PA news agency that Eustice’s comments were “complete nonsense”.
The MP said: “They need to get a grip and understand that this isn’t the way the world works any more. It might have been 20 years ago or something like that, but people expect – rightly so – the highest standards.”
Former minister Tobias Ellwood also underlined how serious the row was, telling the BBC: “We should not deny that this was a dark week for British democracy.”
He said Johnson “needs to think about his legacy and what it’s going to be”, adding: “We need to find our moral compass and get back to what the British people want us to do – good policy, good governance, leadership, statecraft.”
But Starmer said the Prime Minister is unable to clean up Westminster because he is “up to his neck in this”.
Starmer, who returned to the public eye after a period of self-isolation with coronavirus, told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show: “Instead of upholding standards, he ordered his MPs to protect his mate and rip up the whole system – that is corrupt, it is contemptible and it’s not a one-off.”
Asked about Mr Johnson’s future, Starmer said he is “angry” as the reputation of the country and democracy is being “trashed” by the Prime Minister.
Labour is pushing for the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards to investigate the refurbishment of Johnson’s Downing Street flat and his holiday in a Marbella villa owned by the family of environment minister Lord Goldsmith.
The Prime Minister has already been admonished by the commissioner on four occasions, most recently over a £15,000 holiday to the island of Mustique between December 26 2019 and January 5 2020, but this was overturned by the Committee on Standards.
Starmer said: “There is a whiff that the Prime Minister would quite like the scrutiny and the standards to be weakened because they are looking too closely at him.”
Environment Secretary Eustice said the luxury Downing Street flat renovations had already been examined by Lord Geidt, the independent adviser on ministers’ interests, and “put to bed”, suggesting there was no need for Ms Stone to look at it.
“It’s not her role to implement the ministerial code, it’s very much around parliamentary standards and MPs,” he told the Andrew Marr Show.
Labour called for Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg to quit over his role in the standards debacle, while there were also calls on the Tory benches for ministerial resignations.
A Conservative MP representing a “red wall” seat said: “Somebody has to carry the can for this. The obvious candidates are the chief (chief whip Mark Spencer) and/or the Leader of the House.”
Meanwhile opposition parties stepped up attacks on the Government over a Sunday Times report which showed 15 of the last 16 Conservative Party treasurers have been offered a seat in the Lords having each donated more than £3 million to the party.
The Tories denied any link between the donations and the nominations to sit in the Lords, and Mr Eustice claimed their expertise made them “valuable” members of the Upper Chamber.
READ MORE: Did 250 Tory MPs vote to save Paterson amid fear of losing funding?
Eustice said: “They are philanthropists who give huge amounts to charity, who have been very successful in business and, therefore, on those grounds ought to be considered for the Lords.”
Senior SNP MP Pete Wishart said the police should investigate the Sunday Times claims.
“The Metropolitan Police should launch a fresh cash for honours investigation to determine whether a criminal offence has been committed,” he said.
“It is utterly appalling that so many millionaire Tory party donors have been handed life peerages by Boris Johnson and his predecessors.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel