FORMER prime minister Sir John Major has launched an extraordinary broadside at Boris Johnson’s Government over the Owen Paterson row.
The Conservative former premier said the conduct was “shameful” and had trashed the reputation of Parliament.
And he suggested the Johnson administration was “politically corrupt” over its treatment of the House of Commons.
The Prime Minister was forced to U-turn over a plan to prevent Paterson facing a 30-day Commons suspension for a serious breach of lobbying rules.
Paterson (below) subsequently quit as an MP after the Government abandoned an attempt to set up a Tory-dominated committee to re-examine his case and the wider Commons standards regime.
Major said: “I think the way the Government handled that was shameful, wrong and unworthy of this or indeed any government. It also had the effect of trashing the reputation of Parliament.”
The former prime minister, whose opposition to Brexit has seen him at odds with Johnson’s Government, told BBC Radio 4’s Today the action of the current administration was “damaging at home and to our reputation overseas”.
Major, whose own government in the 1990s was undermined by sleaze rows, said: “When that happened I set up the Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life to stop it, which has been a huge success.
“The striking difference is this: in the 1990s I set up a committee to tackle this sort of behaviour.
“Over the last few days we have seen today’s government trying to defend this sort of behaviour.
“Sleaze is unacceptable, was unacceptable when I was there, and I suffered a great deal of pain and anguish over it.
“It’s unacceptable today, and it needs to be stopped.”
READ MORE: 'Grotesque and deeply offensive': Sturgeon condemns possible peerage for Paterson
He suggested there was an arrogance at the heart of Johnson’s administration.
“There is a general whiff of ‘we are the masters now’ about their behaviour.”
He added: “Whenever they run up against difficulties with anybody – whether it is the Supreme Court, the Electoral Commission, the BBC, they react not with an understanding, not with trying to placate what has gone wrong, but actually in rather a hostile fashion.”
The Government has a working majority of around 80 and Major suggested that had allowed Johnson to treat Parliament “with contempt”.
Key announcements were briefed to sections of the media before MPs, he said, and ministers had “behaved badly” in “ways that are perhaps politically corrupt”.
Paterson was found to have breached lobbying rules in an “egregious” way by the Commons Standards Committee following an investigation by Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Kathryn Stone.
But as MPs prepared to vote on a 30-day suspension, which could have triggered the recall process for a by-election, the Government threw its weight behind an amendment to appoint a new committee to look again at the case and the disciplinary system.
When that plan was ditched by the Government Paterson resigned as an MP, but Downing Street has refused to rule out the possibility of recommending him for a peerage.
Major said that would be “rather extraordinary” and expressed doubt that it would be approved.
The debacle has led to fury among Tory MPs who were whipped to vote for the controversial plan, only to see it jettisoned.
Chief Whip Mark Spencer has been the target of largely anonymous briefings blaming him for the fiasco although Downing Street has publicly backed him.
Senior Tory backbencher Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown told Today that ultimately the Prime Minister was responsible for the mistakes in handling the situation.
“The Chief Whip was merely doing his job, he was collating the strands of opinion, he was then reporting that back to No 10 who decided what to do and what decisions were made,” Clifton-Brown said.
“The Prime Minister is in charge of the party, in charge of the Government, ultimately he must take responsibility.”
Major said Spencer and Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg (below) had a duty to the Prime Minister to inform him of the mood in Parliament.
“Plainly either they told him the mood was wrong and he brushed their concerns aside, which may have happened, or alternatively they were not in touch with Parliament.”
Meanwhile Tammy Banks, one of the non-MPs who sits on the Standards Committee, defended the process and the work of Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Kathryn Stone.
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng had suggested her future was in doubt and allies of Paterson have publicly criticised her handling of the case.
Banks said she had been “appalled” by “slanderous” attacks on Stone.
She told BBC Radio 4’s Week In Westminster: “She works hard, she does her best and above everything else she is fair.”
Responding to Major’s comments, SNP MP Pete Wishart said: "Boris Johnson's Tory government is so corrupt and sleazy that even former Conservative Prime Ministers are speaking out against this growing threat to UK democracy.
"As John Major says, this isn't about one isolated incident of Tory corruption, it is a trend that has seen the UK Government beset by scandal after scandal. There must now be a full public inquiry, and those responsible must be held to account - including the Prime Minister.
"Boris Johnson and his senior Tory ministers have broken the law and the ministerial code, they've handed peerages, public contracts and jobs to party donors, and they've been found soliciting dodgy donations for luxury holidays and home refurbishments. It absolutely stinks.
"These corrupt practices have been going on at Westminster for decades, under Tory and Labour governments. The only real fix is for Scotland is to become an independent country and shake off the broken Westminster system for good."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel