RISHI Sunak's decision to cut tax surcharges for bank profits by more than half in his upcoming Autumn Budget has been condemned by the SNP.
The cut to taxes for banks comes less than a month after the UK cut Universal Credit for millions and as a hike in National Insurance payments is set to be introduced.
UK Chancellor Sunak, a former investment banker and hedge fund manager, is reportedly planning to cut the tax surcharge on bank profits in next week's Budget to help boost London’s competitiveness as a global financial centre.
Sunak is expected to announce that the surcharge will be cut from 8% to 3% (a cut of 62.5%) from April 2023 when he announces the UK Government's spending plans on Wednesday, October 27.
It comes ahead of a hike in corporation tax from 19% to 25% in 2023, which Sunak had cautioned risks making “the taxation of banks uncompetitive”.
READ MORE: Facebook set to 'change name' in rebrand amid metaverse plans
Banks currently pay 27% tax on profits, of which 19% is corporation tax and 8% the bank surcharge.
They would see their overall corporation tax charge increase to 33% in 2023 if the surcharge was not reduced but the expected reduction would instead rise to 28%, an increase of just one per cent.
The UK cut Universal Credit payments by £1040 per year for millions across the UK as a £20 per week uplift brought in due to the coronavirus pandemic was axed on Wednesday, October 6.
National Insurance contributions are set to rise from April 2022 by 1.25% which has been dubbed a new "Tory poll tax" by the SNP.
SNP shadow chancellor Alison Thewliss (above) said: “It beggars belief that at a time when Tory cuts and tax hikes will leave the majority of families worse off and push many into poverty - the Chancellor is planning a taxpayer-funded giveaway to banks so they can make bigger profits at our expense.
“It’s unclear whether this is some sort of bad joke - but ordinary families won’t be laughing if the Tories slash household incomes to fund handouts for the wealthiest in society.
“Under Boris Johnson, the UK already has the worst levels of poverty and inequality in north west Europe - and the highest levels of in-work poverty this century. It’s inexplicable that the Tories would fund tax breaks for the rich while poverty soars on their watch.
“It’s now beyond all doubt that there will be no fair recovery under Westminster rule. The only way to keep Scotland safe from Tory cuts is to become an independent country, with the full powers needed to build a fairer society.”
READ MORE: Treasury ‘protecting banker bonuses’ but snubs NHS staff tax-free payments
The move to cut tax surcharges for bank profits follows comments by city minister John Glen MP last month flagging that the surcharge could be cut as he vowed that Britain’s financial services sector would enjoy “competitive tax rates”.
Glen also said at the time he would keep under review the bankers’ bonus cap as the UK looks to bolster the competitiveness of the City in the wake of Brexit, which has seen jobs and bank offices shift to rivals such as Frankfurt, Paris and New York.
The bank tax was introduced by former chancellor George Osborne on profits of more than £25 million in 2015, taking effect in January 2016, as cuts were made to the bank levy – launched in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel