A £200 MILLION freight hub at one of Scotland's biggest regeneration sites would be a "white elephant" that would change a whole town "forever", an MSP claims.
Logistics operator Russell Group wants to build a new HQ and railhead logistics hub on derelict land where the Ravenscraig steel mill once stood. The plant was the largest of its kind in Western Europe but closed under Thatcher.
The new development plan promises to include a training academy and test facility for innovation, and to create hundreds of jobs in the Motherwell area.
But the land was initially earmarked for leisure and retail development and a housing development sits alongside. As many as 1000 properties have either been approved or built and residents have hit out at the shift in plans for the land.
More than 600 formal objections were lodged against the proposals over traffic and otehr issues, and Ravenscraig Community Action Group has been campaigning against the development, which was a major local issue in this year's Holyrood election. The matter is before North Lanarkshire Council.
Now Gillian Mackay of the Scottish Greens has joined the community group to launch an online consultation asking locals to submit their vision for the former steelworks site.
READ MORE: Edinburgh to consider plan for new £1.3 billion coastal town
Mackay, who was elected in May, said: "This white elephant proposal would change the character of Motherwell forever and it is not the vision that residents were sold for their community. The developers are talking green and acting dirty.
"It’s time for the new community Lanarkshire was promised, building back better from the pandemic, not massive industrial buildings and 800 dirty diesel HGV’s passing by a number of schools in the town 24 hours a day.
"I strongly oppose this development and would encourage other elected representatives, Scottish Government, Scottish Enterprise, North Lanarkshire Council, net zero public agencies and partners, to work with residents to develop alternative, more ambitious and more appropriate proposals for this national development priority."
She went on: "COP26 is just round the corner and the eyes of the world are on Scotland. This would see an increase in light and air pollution, have a huge environmental and ecological impact, as well as loss of ancient woodland.
"We’re asking the people of Motherwell to put forward their vision for the future. Do we want more over-industrialisation, or do we want a fairer, greener, society committed to tackling emissions?”
Elaine Morris of Ravenscraig Community Action Group commented: "I am furious and angry about the change of plans for this area. These proposals are incompatible with the development plan, the local plan and the Ravenscraig masterplan. Like nearly 1000 families, we came to Ravenscraig on the promise of a new, thriving, sustainable and safe community. It’s a direct broken promise made to local families."
READ MORE: Women's Aid funding cut protest sees 300 handbags placed outside council offices
Tom Faichen, who is also part of the group, added: "People have no idea of the scale of the plans or the negative impact on communities – from Carfin and Newarthill, right through Ravenscraig, Motherwell and down Airbles Road. When they do find out, they’re furious.
"We want communities, councillors and parliamentarians to urgently demand more for Scotland’s largest brownfield regeneration site. We demand a better choice for Ravenscraig."
The current plans are the result of protracted talks between site developer Ravenscraig Ltd – a joint venture involving Scottish Enterprise, Tata Steel and Wilson Bowden Developments – and Russell Group. Nick Davies, director of the developer, has said the scheme "would drive real tangible benefits in terms of economic impact and job creation, as well as being a catalyst for other development" and "deserves to be considered on its merits".
North Lanarkshire Council and the Russell Group have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel