A CONSERVATIVE minister has refused to deny claims that Russian spies "stole" the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine to create their own jag.
Home Office minister Damian Hinds would not be drawn on allegations that the vaccine design was used to create Russia's Sputnik V jab, instead saying more generally that "state activity" was involved in "industrial espionage".
His comments come after a report by the Sun newspaper which suggests "security services" sources have evidence that Russian intelligence agents had stolen the Oxford vaccine design.
Hinds told LBC: "We live in world, I am afraid, where there is state activity seeking to engage in industrial espionage and economic espionage, there are cyber attacks that happen and so on.
"I won't comment on the specific case that you mention because that wouldn't be right to do in detail, but it would be fair to say, correct to say, that we face threats of this type that are different, they are more sophisticated, they are more extensive than they ever have been before.
"The face of espionage, the face of spying, is very different from when you and I were growing up and we need to constantly upgrade our capability. These are very serious matters."
FACT CHECK: Claim Scottish independence 'would delight Vladimir Putin'
Conservative MP Bob Seely, a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, told the Sun that the UK needs to "get serious about Russian and Chinese espionage".
The Isle of Wight MP said: "Whether it is stealing the design for AstraZeneca or blackmailing us over energy by these authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, we need to get wise to them."
Last year, UK security services had accused Russian spies of trying to steal details of coronavirus vaccine research being carried out by the UK, US and Canada.
In 2020, then-foreign secretary Dominic Raab condemned a "shabby" disinformation campaign by Russia, which sought to discredit the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.
The campaign suggested the vaccine could turn people into monkeys because it uses a chimpanzee virus as a vector – even though that is a common practice in vaccine development.
The campaign was allegedly targeted at countries where Russia wanted to sell its own Sputnik V vaccine, as well as at Western nations.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel