THE Duke of York may have to acknowledge the civil sex case brought against him following reports a judge has ruled the paperwork can be delivered to Andrew’s US lawyer.
Andrew’s legal team have contested whether he has been officially notified about Virginia Giuffre’s claim for damages from the duke after she alleged he sexually assaulted her.
But it has been reported that the judge in the case, US district judge Lewis Kaplan, has ruled Giuffre’s legal team can try delivering the papers to Andrew’s Los Angeles-based lawyer, regardless of whether the duke authorised him to accept it.
READ MORE: 'Wanted' Prince Andrew billboards appear outside Scottish Asda
The issue of whether or not Andrew has been notified about the case – known as service of proceedings – was contested during the first pre-trial hearing of the civil case on Monday in New York.
It is an important matter as telling a defendant about legal action being brought against them is the first step in the judicial process.
David Boies, representing Giuffre, said papers had been “delivered to the last-known address of the defendant” and documents had also been sent “by Royal Mail”.
An image of a letter addressed to Andrew – at his Royal Lodge home in Berkshire – being posted in a UK red letterbox has been published online.
Andrew B Brettler, the duke’s attorney, said the royal’s team contested the validity of service to date, adding he has not been properly served under either UK or international law.
In another development, the High Court in London accepted on Wednesday a request by Giuffre’s lawyers to formally contact Andrew about the legal proceedings launched in America.
It is understood Andrew’s team are contesting the court’s decision and the High Court has given the duke’s lawyers seven days to challenge its decision. The High Court said in a statement: “Lawyers for Prince Andrew have indicated that they may seek to challenge the decision of the High Court to recognise the validity of the Hague Convention request for service made by Ms Giuffre’s lawyers.
“The High Court has directed that any challenge must be made by close of business on September 24.”
The news follows revelations that Andrew has not been his usual "blase" self and that the mood on the Queen's Balmoral estate has undergone a "dramatic shift".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel