MARCUS Rashford is urging Boris Johnson’s government reverse plans to cut a £20 per week benefits boost.
The Manchester United and England footballer is again hoping to prompt a high-profile U-turn having twice convinced Tory ministers to scrap plans to end free school meals for hungry children in England.
He is rebooting the school meals campaign, urging Downing Street to offer free meals to more families, ensure long-term funding for the holiday activity and food programme, and expand the Healthy Start fruit and vegetables voucher scheme.
He is also understood to oppose plans to cut “lifeline” Universal Credit payments next month, according to the Guardian.
Rashford said: “What is it going to take for these children to be prioritised? Instead of removing support through social security, we should be focusing efforts on developing a sustainable long-term roadmap out of this child hunger pandemic.
“Whilst we’ve come a long way in the last 20 months, placing the issue of child food poverty at the forefront, devastatingly, the issue is getting worse not better.”
It comes as new research reveals carers, shelf stackers and hairdressers will be among the workers hit by the biggest overall drop in welfare payments being compounded by the Universal Credit cut.
Primary teachers, nurses and street cleaners will also be potentially losing more than £1700 per year compared to 2010 if the £20-a-week uplift ends next month as planned.
Johnson is coming under pressure from charities, campaigners and even Tory MPs to scrap the end of the temporary increase introduced during the coronavirus pandemic.
READ MORE: Tories dismiss plea from devolved parliaments to reverse Universal Credit cut
Recipients of Universal Credit could lose £1040 annually if the Prime Minister goes ahead with the cut.
Research from the Action for Children charity went further to examine how much less a sole-earner couple with two children will receive in social security compared to 2010, factoring in previous benefit squeezes.
The families of hairdressers will have lost £1982 on average, shelf stackers £1843 and care workers £1773, according to the analysis.
Street cleaners were estimated to lose £1769, nurses £1736 and primary school teachers £1734.
Action for Children policy director Imran Hussain urged the Prime Minister to rethink the plan, warning it is a "recipe for disaster for struggling families".
"Too many childhoods are overshadowed by poverty and hardship, and the pandemic is making things worse," he said.
"We're talking about hairdressers, shop-workers and carers - not big earners but people who are proud to work and do everything they can to provide for their children."
The £20 weekly uplift was introduced temporarily to help claimants weather the storm of the coronavirus pandemic.
But ministers plan to start phasing out the increase from the end of September, based on individual claimants' payment dates.
A Government spokesman said: "As announced by the Chancellor at the Budget, the uplift to Universal Credit was always temporary.
"It was designed to help claimants through the economic shock and financial disruption of the toughest stages of the pandemic, and it has done so.
"Universal Credit will continue to provide vital support for those both in and out of work, and it's right that the Government should focus on our Plan for Jobs, supporting people back into work and supporting those already employed to progress and earn more."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel