Plymouth gunman Jake Davison should have been on a police watchlist before he killed five people and himself in a shooting spree, a former top prosecutor said.
Nazir Afzal, who was previously chief crown prosecutor for the North West of England said Davison, 22, was “exactly the type of person the authorities should be keeping an eye on”.
Davison killed his mother on Thursday in the Keyham area of Plymouth before going on to shoot dead four more people, including a three-year-old girl, and injured two others.
An investigation has since been launched by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) into Davison’s possession of a shotgun and a firearms licence, which were returned to him in July after being removed last December following an allegation of assault against him in September 2020.
READ MORE: Three-year-old girl among victims of mass shooting in Plymouth
When asked on BBC Breakfast earlier today (August 14) if Davison should have been on a watchlist, Afzal said: “Yes, absolutely, particularly given that he had a firearms licence and given that we now learn in December it was taken off him temporarily because of allegations he was facing and returned to him.
“He was exactly the kind of person that you would be keeping an eye on or the authorities should be keeping an eye on.”
Afzal said none of Davison’s social media posts seemed to have been taken into account when restoring his gun licence.
When asked if a year seemed like a short period of time for the licence to be revoked, he said: “100% I agree with you.
“It’s not just about the fact that the gun was returned to him, his licence was restored.
“In the interim there were all these social media posts talking about the violence he believed in or felt was necessary, how he felt about women.
“None of that seems to have been taken into account.”
He added: “If they [the police] were aware [of his social media posts] then they have got even more questions to be asked.”
Davison’s social media use suggested he was involved in the “incel” culture, a following in which people describe themselves as “involuntary celibates” and feel they are being oppressed by women due to a perceived lack of sexual interest.
READ MORE: Social media companies act to remove Plymouth gunman's accounts
Afzal said that Davison’s social media posts painted a picture of a man who thought women were “lesser beings”.
He added: “We have now seen posts on various social media sites which paint a picture of somebody that has a very low opinion or had a very low opinion of women, who seemed to have a belief he was entitled to do whatever he wanted to, a real expectation that women were some kind of lesser being.
“That kind of extreme misogyny of the type we have seen here and in terms of the incel community is a threat to all women and, ultimately, to all our communities.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel