THE Faculty of Advocates has slammed Prime Minister Boris Johnson for his latest attack on supposedly "left-wing criminal justice lawyers", stating that Johnson “risks damaging the system of criminal justice irreparably.”
In a rare foray into the political arena, the Faculty joined widespread criticism of Johnson from all sections of the legal profession, deploring his remarks broadcast yesterday.
In an interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Johnson attacked the Labour Party as having "consistently taken the side of left-wing criminal justice lawyers against the interests of the public".
The Faculty, the organisation of advocates that is more than 500 years old, issued a hard-hitting statement that the comments went hand in hand with recent pronouncements by the Home Secretary and appeared to be "part of a strategy to undermine the rule of law".
The statement continued: "It is essential to a fair system of justice that those charged with crime have legal representation. Without such representation, no conviction would be safe. For the Prime Minister to undermine that principle, with the aim of political posturing, is damaging to the rule of law.
"Lawyers represent their clients without associating themselves with the merits, or the politics, of their client’s position. They do so because that is their duty. The nature of this duty does not change whether the lawyer is prosecuting or defending a case. The Prime Minister knows this and yet sees fit to make political capital from a baseless mischaracterisation. In so doing, he risks damaging the system of criminal justice irreparably.
"Moreover, the current rhetoric around lawyers is irresponsible and risks serious consequences. Those in the criminal justice system – judges, prosecution and defence – have kept the legal system afloat in very difficult circumstances. For the Prime Minister and his Government to treat key workers in this manner is entirely unsatisfactory."
Johnson has form for deprecating lawyers that do not agree with him – he used the term “lefty human rights lawyers” at the Tory Party’s conference last October, provoking a storm of criticism.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson warned indyref2 court fight would be 'gift' for Nicola Sturgeon
In response to the latest attack, Derek Sweeting QC, chair of the Bar Council for England & Wales, tweeted: "Sad to see unfounded 'left-wing criminal justice lawyer' comments from the Prime Minister. Criminal lawyers, designated key workers by the government, act independently, prosecuting on behalf of the public or defending members of the public – in the public interest."
Barrister Mary Aspinall-Miles tweeted: "He clearly hasn’t met many criminal lawyers. To hold the state to account and in check is a principle upheld by all criminal lawyers of all political hues."
The high-profile anonymous blogger Secret Barrister tweeted that Johnson was "dog whistling" and added: “I prosecute rapists while you prolong the agony of victims by cutting justice to the bone. One of us is acting against the interests of the public, Boris Johnson. It’s not me.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel