LEAVING Erasmus after Brexit was “utterly unnecessary” but Scotland should not give up hope of rejoining the programme, Michael Russell has said.
Scotland’s Constitution Secretary said the devolved nations “were not told the truth” by the UK Government and believed it was trying to remain in the scheme “right up until virtually the end”.
But speaking to Holyrood’s Finance and Constitution Committee, Russell said Scotland should continue attempts to rejoin the scheme following the “shocking” decision to leave it.
READ MORE: Erasmus: EU chief says Scotland cannot join scheme while part of the UK
He told MSPs that he and Welsh Government Brexit minister Jeremy Miles had urged the UK Government to remain in the exchange programme, or push for the devolved countries to be allowed to continue to be part of it.
However the UK Government concluded the programme was too expensive and withdrew from it, announcing an alternative called the Turing scheme named after the mathematician and computer scientist Alan Turing.
A group of more than 140 MEPs wrote to the European Commission asking it to consider allowing Scotland and Wales to continue taking part in Erasmus.
The bid was rebuffed by commission president Ursula von der Leyen yesterday, when she said Holyrood and the Senedd could not diverge from the decision “made in London”.
During today's evidence session about Brexit’s impact on Scotland’s constitutional affairs, Russell said the decision was “factually correct” but added: “Let’s not give up.
“There may be all sorts of possibilities we can look at but it is a loss, it’s a substantial loss.
“I would want to continue to argue.
“We’ve got lots of friends in the European Parliament who are very, very keen that we continue to have some association.
“We can see Ireland is taking Northern Irish young people under its wing and they will be associated with the scheme through Irish institutions and organisations.
“We need to continue to think about what we can do.
READ MORE: Scottish and Welsh governments make joint Erasmus education statement
“But two things are shameful about it: it’s utterly unnecessary, we could have remained part of it, which is ridiculous; but also the manner by which it was done.
“The UK Government knew perfectly well the view of the devolved governments on this matter and we were not told the truth about it.
“We were never shown the value for money assessment was undertaken, and right up until virtually the end, we believe that the UK Government was intending to stay in or at least trying to stay in.
“It was shocking.”
The Turing scheme will provide funding for an estimated 35,000 students in universities, colleges and schools to go on placements and exchanges overseas, starting this September, the UK Government says.
But Russell said: “The Turing scheme does not deal with youth work and with youth issues, which is a huge part of the Erasmus plus scheme and very, very important to Scotland.
“There’s a process now of telling people essentially what it’s going to be about, but there’s been no meaningful consultation about what it should be – even right down to naming it.
“This thing just appeared.
“Clearly work was being done on it and we were not being told about that work.
“It doesn’t give you huge confidence in it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel