PARLIAMENT will tomorrow be asked to back the break up of Education Scotland and major reform of the SQA.
The move follows continued criticism of the bodies over their actions during the Covid pandemic.
A motion to go before the Scottish Parliament tomorrow claims neither organisation is "fit for purpose" and both have "lost the confidence of teachers, pupils and parents".
The Scottish Greens have already urged the board of the SQA, Scotland's exam body, to resign and called for an overhaul of the system following the exam chaos of 2020.
John Swinney survived a vote of no confidence after MSP colleagues backed him in a challenge brought after grades were restored to teacher estimates in a Scottish Government climb-down that preceded similar action in England.
Now the LibDems are asking parliament to back reforms the party says will make education bosses "more accountable".
READ MORE: Greens issue call for an overhaul of exams in letter to John Swinney
This includes cutting Education Scotland into independent inspection and policy functions and making the SQA "grounded in the teaching profession".
The motion, by Willie Rennie, states that "the support, services and decision-making provided by Education Scotland and the SQA have not met the expectations or requirements of hardworking teachers, pupils or parents throughout the disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic" and says "serious concerns existed about the performance and structure of these organisations for years before the pandemic struck".
Rennie said: "At a time of disruption and worry, instead of making peoples' jobs and lives easier, they have made them harder.
"Despite months of warnings, the SQA and John Swinney teamed up to create an exams system and algorithm that actively penalised pupils from the poorest backgrounds.
"After Education Scotland previously gave teachers 20,000 pages of guidance on Curriculum for Excellence, during this pandemic they have gone to the other end of the scale and been totally absent when people needed them.
"Both of the Scottish Government's education quangos have lost the confidence of those who they are supposed to serve and have repeatedly shown that they are not fit for purpose."
Deputy First Minister John Swinney said: “Teachers, support staff and other professionals working in education – in schools, colleges, councils and our national agencies - have supported Scotland’s children and young people very well throughout the pandemic, including during periods of remote learning. Despite the challenges of the pandemic, our partners in education have continued to contribute to important work on the future of Scottish education, such as the independent review of Curriculum for Excellence led by the OECD and in preparing for alternative approaches to certification. For that, they deserve thanks and recognition from Parliament.
“The suggestion that Education Scotland should be separated into independent inspection and policy functions shows a misunderstanding of their role. The Scottish Government, not Education Scotland, is responsible for policy on education. Education Scotland is the national improvement agency for education.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel