THE last time a Savanta ComRes poll showed the pro-independence vote on 53% was last October.
It represented a non-significant 1% drop on the previous poll from the same firm in August, and coincided with an Ipsos MORI telephone poll that showed Yes at an all-time high.
So if we’d known then that another Savanta ComRes poll in February would again put Yes at 53%, we’d probably have taken that as proof that nothing much was really going to change, and that the indy vote would hold steady at an unprecedentedly high level.
The reason most people are not now interpreting it that way is that there have been two Savanta ComRes polls in the intervening period putting Yes at 58% and 57% respectively. So all of a sudden 53% appears disappointing, and seems to be evidence of substantial slippage.
But in fact that’s only one of two ways of looking at it. It could just as easily be that the firm’s previous two polls were aberrations, and that normal service has now been resumed.
If that’s right, there’s no reason to assume that other firms will show a similar drop – and it’s to be very much hoped they won’t, because a 4% decline would be enough to push No back into the lead with YouGov, Survation and Panelbase.
READ MORE: Stunning new poll records majority support for Scottish independence
The snag is, of course, that it’s not hard to think of reasons why there might well have been a genuine swing against Yes in recent days and weeks. There’s been the ongoing fallout from the Sturgeon vs Salmond feud, there’s been the SNP leadership’s self-inflicted distraction of the Joanna Cherry sacking, and there’s been a Unionist media hell-bent on convincing us that the roll-out of the vaccine somehow wipes away the UK Government’s catastrophic mishandling of the pandemic.
And yet here’s the odd thing: in spite of the difficult circumstances, the Savanta ComRes poll suggests there has essentially been no change in the SNP’s support in voting intentions for the Scottish Parliament.
On the constituency ballot, the SNP has even nudged up by one percentage point and now stand at a commanding 54%.
If the fall in the Yes vote had been caused by a reaction against the SNP, it would be reasonable to expect that the SNP itself would take a corresponding hit – indeed it might even be expected that the SNP would suffer more severely.
The fact that hasn’t happened could suggest that all is not quite as it seems on the main indy question. But, as ever, we’ll just have to wait for more polls to find out for sure.
Even if it turns out that both the SNP and the Yes movement have dodged a bullet for the time being, there are still warning signs in this poll.
A supplementary question reveals that 45% of respondents now believe that the SNP is “divided” – six percentage points higher than before.
It seems inconceivable that change hasn’t at least been partly caused by the sacking of Joanna Cherry. Party strategists must be privately wondering if they should have heeded the old adage that divided parties can sometimes struggle to win elections.
In the unlikely event that the voting intentions from the poll are exactly replicated on election day, pro-independence parties would take 64% of seats at Holyrood – a level of dominance that has never been seen before.
Even in the 2011 Parliament, the SNP, Greens and Margo MacDonald in combination held only 56% of the seats.
The arrival of Scotland’s first truly “independence-minded” Parliament could further foster a sense of inevitability about its progression towards sovereign statehood.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel