THE branding of George Galloway's Alliance for Unity party is being investigated by the Ministry of Defence's copyright lawyers, The National can reveal.
A4U are a grouping of people with varying political allegiances that hope to stop pro-independence parties gaining a majority in May’s Holyrood election.
The party is using imagery of patriotism and the military to aid their political messaging –with a red, white and blue circular logo identical to the Royal Air Force (RAF) Roundel prominently displayed in both colour and grayscale on their webpage. It also appears on their Twitter page, which features images of Galloway with the logo behind him.
A4U have even registered the logo as an symbol to be used on ballot papers and this has been accepted by the Electoral Commission, partly because the imagery will show up in black and white on printed ballot forms.
The Ministry of Defence's brand and licensing team told The National: "This isn’t allowed or approved I will let our copyright lawyers know it is for them to deal with. Thank you for highlighting this to us."
The Electoral Commission said: "Parties may register up to 12 party descriptions and up to three emblems with the Electoral Commission.
"At certain elections a registered emblem or party description may be used on the ballot paper.
"We do not regulate how a party wishes to brand itself when that message does not appear on ballot papers."
A spokesperson for A4U said: "Our logo, as approved by the Electoral Commission, is different to that of the RAF Roundel. No official A4U branding contains the RAF roundel.
"All applications to register political parties are subject to a statutory consultation process, whereby members of the public and organisations including the MoD are able to object to any proposed names, emblems or descriptions.
"We are pleased that the Electoral Commission approved our name, emblem and descriptions after that process, and we look forward to putting our case to the people of Scotland in the run up to the Holyrood elections in May."
READ MORE: Football fan group slams 'arrogant' George Galloway over Boxing Day match
The Royal Air Force is keen to protect its trademark as it has a history dating back to the First World War.
Until then the underside of the aircraft of what was then called the Royal Flying Corps was marked with a Union Jack flag to help avoid being shot down by friendly fire.
But at high altitudes only the cross of the flag was visible and it looked similar to the Iron Cross used on German planes – so the concentric circles target sign was adopted instead.
In 2008, the RAF lauched a legal bid to stop Next using its roundel symbol on a duvet cover. In 2003, it took on the Arcadia group – the company behind high street brands including Topshop, Burton and Dorothy Perkins – as it tried to get the roundel registered as a trademark for RAF-related clothing.
A4U came under fire last month after MSP hopefuls from the party engaged in sustained attempts to paint the SNP as “Nazis” and Nicola Sturgeon as a “fascist dictator”.
READ MORE: Alliance for Unity MSP hopeful shares 'Nicola Sturgeon a fascist dictator’ post
The slurs included one Holyrood candidate affiliated with the party promoting suggestions the SNP will make Unionists wear a “badge to identify them”, like “another nationalist party”.
Galloway had also been promoting falsehoods about connections between the SNP and Nazis. In December last year, he tweeted a debunked conspiracy theory that the SNP had taken their logo from a rune meaning “blood and family” which has been widely used by Nazis and neo-Nazis. The SNP’s logo is a stylised combination of a Saltire and a thistle.
It’s time to say: there are no circumstances in which we will accept the break-up, the partition of our country. So long as 100 of us remain alive. @Alliance4Unity pic.twitter.com/hGQM1V5jD1
— George Galloway (@georgegalloway) December 14, 2020
David Griffiths, A4U’s candidate on the West of Scotland list, retweeted a post which claimed Nicola Sturgeon is a “fascist dictator destroying our freedoms”. Elsewhere, he has engaged with the idea that under the SNP, Scotland is “moving towards a nationalist fascist state faster than Germany did in the 1930s”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel