THE Oxford-AstraZeneca jag is less effective against the South African variant of Covid-19, new research suggests.
Scientists found the vaccine offers only limited protection against mild disease caused by the South African mutation.
However, early data from the study, due to be published on Monday, shows the jag can protect against severe disease caused by the variant.
The research, first reported by the Financial Times, into the E484K mutation involved some 2000 people, most of whom were young and healthy.
"We do believe our vaccine could protect against severe disease, as neutralising antibody activity is equivalent to that of other Covid-19 vaccines that have demonstrated activity against more severe disease, particularly when the dosing interval is optimised to eight to 12 weeks," a spokesman reportedly said.
It comes after research released on Friday indicated that the Oxford/AstraZeneca jag is effective at fighting the new UK coronavirus variant.
Andrew Pollard, professor of paediatric infection and immunity, and chief investigator on the Oxford vaccine trial, said: "Data from our trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine in the United Kingdom indicate that the vaccine not only protects against the original pandemic virus, but also protects against the novel variant, B117, which caused the surge in disease from the end of 2020 across the UK."
READ MORE: Jeane Freeman: All adults in Scotland could have had Covid jag in summer
Professor Robin Shattock, who is leading Covid-19 vaccine research at Imperial College London, urged caution about the findings.
He told BBC Breakfast: "It's a very small study with just over 2000 people and it's not published so we can only judge it from the press release and press coverage. But it is concerning to some extent that we're seeing that it's not effective against mild or moderate disease."
Shattock said the study participants had a mean age of around 31 and it is not yet clear how many had two doses, and at what intervals.
He continued: "Oxford, as well as other groups, are already working on vaccines against these variants... we will need to keep updating the vaccines to keep ahead of the virus."
Professor Anthony Harnden, deputy chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, said: "Evidence suggests the Oxford/AZ vaccine protects against disease caused by the predominant Covid variants circulating in the UK.
"It remains highly likely that the vaccine will also protect against severe disease caused by the South African variant."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel