PLANS to strengthen the police complaints system with the aim of reaching a “gold standard” have been announced by the Scottish Government and Lord Advocate.
Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf and Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC have published their response to former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini’s 490-page independent report on complaints handling, investigations and misconduct issues.
They said the Scottish Government and Crown Office accept the majority of her 81 recommendations for reform.
Among the recommendations were increasing the powers of the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc).
The Justice Secretary and Lord Advocate said they view these recommendations “favourably” and will consider the proposals put forward for enhancing the role of Pirc by providing additional statutory powers.
In a letter to the Justice Committee, they commit to establishing a governance framework to oversee, direct and report on progress in taking forward the recommendations, headed by a ministerial group for police complaints and investigations which will meet and report publicly and to the Scottish Parliament three times a year.
They also commit to introducing a single bill in the next parliamentary session, subject to the outcome of the election, to make the necessary legislative changes, supported by regulations where necessary.
Yousaf said: “Scotland is well-served by its police service and the public can be confident that the systems for handling police complaints, investigations of serious incidents and misconduct are fundamentally sound while recognising the importance of bold reform.
“While public confidence in policing is high, we must take every opportunity to sustain and build on that. It is essential that when things go wrong, the police are held to account, lessons are learned and improvements made. The principle of policing by consent, so central to our justice system, is built on this accountability.
“We continue to build on successful improvement work already undertaken since publication of Dame Elish’s preliminary report in June 2019. Significant steps have already been taken by Police Scotland, the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc) and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS).
“I do not underestimate the scale of the task ahead. These are complex issues, involving multiple organisations, additional costs, time and, in many cases, legislative changes – but the improvements will ensure the system is fair, roles and responsibilities are clear, there is transparency, openness and proportionality and the upholding of fundamental human rights. I am committed to delivering these improvements in partnership.”
In the letter, they say they are confident that Scotland has good systems for the handling of police complaints, investigations and misconduct but “our aim is to have the gold standard”, and that Dame Elish’s report provides the “foundation and a roadmap to get us there”.
Wolffe said: “Dame Elish’s comprehensive and detailed investigation has identified several areas requiring reform or improvement.
“Since the publication of her preliminary report in June 2019, a number of procedures relating to the criminal allegations against the police division of COPFS have already been revised.
“COPFS will work with others as we continue to improve how the justice system as a whole responds to these issues.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel