A UK Government health chief has been panned by scientists after claiming no-one could have predicted Covid-19 would mutate.
Baroness Dido Harding also warned that around 20,000 people a day contacted by England’s Test and Trace system are not fully complying with instructions to self-isolate.
The comments came as she appeared in front of MPs on the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee.
The Tory peer, who heads the National Institute for Health Protection after being promoted from her former role running England’s test and trace system, warned that the so-called Kent variant has now become "endemic" and accounts for more than 70% of cases in England.
She added: "Between our business plan being published and us going into the lockdown we're in now, we've seen the virus mutate, we've seen the new variant emerge – which is something that none of us were able to predict."
That assertion was rubbished by Linda Bauld, professor of public health at the University of Edinburgh.
She told The National: "Coronaviruses such as SARS-Cov-2 do change more slowly than most other RNA viruses, but the research community have been documenting changes since the original genetic code was released from China.
“So it’s not the case that mutations were unexpected. We couldn’t predict exactly which variants would emerge but certainly ones that were more transmissible or even one that could result in more severe illness should have been factored into any future planning."
READ MORE: SNP bring forward bill to tackle ‘rampant cronyism’ in Tories
Several leading scientists concurred with that assessment and countered Dido’s claim on social media.
Clare Wenham, assistant professor in global health policy at the London School of Economics, commented: “No-one [predicted the variants], except all the scientists.”
Dr Xand van Tulleken added: “It is a rule of biology – like gravity in physics – that viruses mutate. Literally anyone w A-Level biology could have answered the ‘will it mutate?’ question correctly.”
It is a rule of biology - like gravity in physics - that viruses mutate. Literally anyone w A-Level biology could have answered the “will it mutate?” question correctly. https://t.co/HeKVSrVeE2
— Dr Xand van Tulleken 🏳️🌈 (@xandvt) February 3, 2021
Harding was also asked to address concerns about the number of people who are self-isolating under the test and trace system she set up.
The baroness faced further questions about cronyism, but denied there were "conflicts of interest" with anyone awarded a contract with NHS Test and Trace.
Harding said that research has shown that between 20% and 40% of people contacted by the programme are not fully self-isolating after being instructed to do so.
Based on the rates of people contacted on a daily basis, an optimistic estimate suggests that 20,000 are not fully following self-isolation instructions, MPs heard.
Harding said there could be multiple reasons behind people ignoring the rules, including confusion over the rules, a lack of funds and mental health impacts.
READ MORE: Outrage as Tory donor Lord Ashcroft's firm lands £350m Covid deal
Taking last week's total number of cases and contacts, around 700,000 – which equated to 100,000 a day – she concluded that 20,000 a day are not isolating.
Responding to questions from former health secretary Jeremy Hunt, she said: "Could I add a slight complexity to your calculation which actually might well make your number go up a bit, which is that's the proportion that we know about."
Harding said her biggest concern is the people who feel ill but do not come forward for testing.
Hunt commented: "Thousands of people a day is enough to restart the pandemic."
Harding also revealed there were 2500 consultants working on the project employed in roles surrounding "technical operational process and system design".
They are paid an average of £1100 a day, MPs heard. It is hoped that many of these roles will be transferred to civil service roles, Harding said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel