AN independent public inquiry into the death of a man who was restrained by police will have to scrutinise an estimated 50,000 documents related to the case.
Sheku Bayoh died in May 2015 while being held by officers who were responding to a call in Kirkcaldy, Fife. The 32-year-old’s family have claimed race played a part in his death and they criticised the subsequent investigation.
Lord Bracadale, retired senator of the College of Justice, will lead the inquiry, with Michael Fuller and Raju Bhatt as assessors to support him.
In an opening statement published on the inquiry website at www.shekubayohinquiry.scot, he said: “It has now been over five years since the death of Mr Bayoh and I, and my team, are conscious of the length of time this has hung over all involved, particularly the Bayoh family.
“We will work with determination and focus to ensure the work can be completed as quickly as possible. It is, however, at this stage impossible to say how long the inquiry will take.
“It is only from today, the setting-up date of the inquiry, that we are allowed by law to start ingathering the evidence.
“Preliminary discussions with some of the organisations involved lead us to believe that we will have in the region of 50,000 documents to scrutinise. This will clearly take some time for my team to get through.”
Bracadale added: “After we have considered all the documentary evidence and conducted further investigation, the inquiry will hold public hearings where we will call witnesses to give evidence.
“Again, it is not possible at this stage to say when this will happen; how many witnesses will be called; or how long the hearings will last. First, we must work our way through the documentary evidence and make necessary further inquiries.”
The inquiry was announced a year ago by Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf with its scope determined in May this year. On Thursday, Yousaf said: “The family of Mr Bayoh have shown remarkable dignity and perseverance during their five-year wait for an inquiry into the death of Sheku.
“I hope that today’s announcement gives them comfort and reassurance that the circumstances surrounding his death will be examined in a public and transparent manner.
“The formal start of the inquiry is a key milestone and I am confident the assessors will ably assist the chair to consider issues relevant to the terms of reference.
“The inquiry will examine the circumstances leading up to the death of Mr Bayoh, the post-incident management process and subsequent investigation. The inquiry will also establish the extent to which Mr Bayoh’s actual or perceived race played a part in events, if any.”
A statement from lawyer Aamer Anwar, on behalf of Bayoh’s family and partner Collette Bell, welcomed the opening statement, while also appreciating the inquiry may now adjourn for many months.
Anwar said: “Fighting for a proper investigation, never mind achieving meaningful change, has involved the Bayohs in enormous challenges and obstacles at great personal cost to the emotional and physical health of their family, young and old.
“In his death Sheku was smeared, vilified and criminalised in order to negate his right to life, so as the inquiry begins, we should never forget that Sheku Bayoh was a 32-year-old black man, with no previous history of violence. He was a loving father, partner, son and brother who died in police custody.
“Sheku’s loved ones fought for justice, but that word was betrayed by the Lord Advocate, so now all their hopes lie in Lord Bracadale delivering the truth.
“But in the end, the real test of this inquiry will not be the sympathy expressed for a family who have conducted themselves throughout with utmost dignity, but whether this country acts to ensure that real change takes place in an unaccountable, all-powerful justice system.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here