EUROPEAN Union foreign ministers are weighing up whether to impose sanctions on dozens of Belarus officials, including president Alexander Lukashenko, after holding talks with his exiled main opponent.
The European Union has drawn up a list of around 40 people it could hit with asset freezes and travel bans in response to irregularities in the August 9 elections that gave Lukashenko a sixth term in office, and over the crackdown that followed.
The question is whether to include Lukashenko, who has repressed opposition and independent news media during 26 years in power and refuses to talk with the protesters.
Some European Union countries want to gradually ramp up pressure on him by expanding the sanctions list if he refuses to enter into dialogue with the opposition, rather than hit everyone at once.
READ MORE: European nations say Iran sanctions are legally void
Speaking after a number of ministers met Lukashenko’s main opponent, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, over breakfast, German foreign minister Heiko Maas said “the violence that Lukashenko is exerting against peaceful demonstrators is completely unacceptable”.
Maas, whose country currently holds the European Union’s rotating presidency, said the ministers must “ask ourselves the question of whether Mr Lukashenko, the one who bears the main responsibility, mustn’t also be sanctioned by the European Union”.
EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the ministers will also weigh up what support they can give to the Belarusian people, and what relations they should have with Minsk given that “we don’t recognise Lukashenko as the legitimate president of Belarus”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here