CONCERNS remain over the operators of a coronavirus-hit care home in Skye that could have its registration suspended, a court has been told.
Roddy Dunlop QC appeared via video link at Inverness Sheriff Court on behalf of Social Care and Social Work Improvement Scotland, which is pursuing the legal action against HC-One, operators of the Home Farm premises.
The case was launched in March after it was revealed 10 residents had died at the care home amid the outbreak, while 30 others and 29 staff have tested positive for Covid-19 at the facility in Portree.
Dunlop submitted a motion before Sheriff Eilidh MacDonald yesterday, which aims for remaining concerns to be addressed by the firm, with an option to come back to the judge in two weeks seeking to strip it of its licence if this is not done.
The lawyer said: “I’m happy to recount improvements at the home, my lady, but it would be wrong for me to suggest that the concerns of the pursuer had been completely allayed.
“In particular, my lady, it is the sense of the pursuer’s inspectors that to an extent the improvements are a result of and indeed contingent on the intervention of NHS Highland.
“It is known for obvious reasons the intervention of NHS Highland will not and cannot last forever.
“There will come a point in time – and it is anticipated that may be soon – at which NHS Highland require to depart.”
Dunlop then submitted a motion to allow a further two weeks so “robust systems” could be put in place to address remaining concerns.
The case first came to the court on May 20 when it was decided there would be three weeks of inspections and collaboration with other stakeholders to see if problems at the premises could be rectified.
Peter Gray QC, representing HC-One, did not oppose the motion for the matter to continue for another two weeks but rejected suggestions about the reason for the improvements.
He said: “I do wish to make it clear that I reject entirely the suggestion made by my learned friend that the improvements that have been made to date at Home Farm are due essentially to the efforts of NHS Highland, rather than those whom I represent.”
The lawyer told the court he will provide evidence improvements that have been made are due to collaboration when the case next calls.
MacDonald continued the matter until June 24.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here