COMHAIRLE nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) recently attracted a flurry of media attention by announcing that Gaelic-medium education (GME) will become the default model in the islands’ schools, so that parents preferring English-medium education will have to opt out. GME has been offered in the islands’ schools since 1987, but English has been the default option up to now.
The new policy is welcome but hardly radical. GME is a long-established and successful model, not only in the Western Isles but across Scotland. Parents will still have the option of English-medium education, unlike in northwest Wales where only Welsh-medium education is available.
READ MORE: Gaelic becomes default language for pupils starting school in Western Isles
There is a consensus in Gaelic circles that more must be done to secure the position of the language in the Western Isles, the only part of Scotland where the language remains widely spoken in the community. There is much less agreement on what steps ought to be taken – indeed there has been relatively little serious, focused discussion.
A key difficulty is that the language is now greatly weakened even in the rural Western Isles. The 2011 census showed that only 52% of the islands’ population could speak Gaelic; this will probably fall below 50% in 2021. Research demonstrates that the actual use of the language has declined substantially in recent decades. Any policies that seek to secure Gaelic in the Western Isles must be based on these realities.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Gaelic must be Scotland's national language
The fundamental problems are economic and social in nature. The Gaelic-speaking areas of Scotland have suffered significant population loss for almost two hundred years, as people have migrated to the cities or overseas in search of better life opportunities. The population of the Western Isles fell by 41% between 1911 and 2011 and is projected to fall a further 14% by 2041.
The islands are highly peripheral within Scotland, far away from the main centres of economic activity. The local economy is fragile, with a limited range of jobs, relatively few of them paying well.
Economic development in the islands has been an ongoing challenge. There is clearly little prospect of major investment by multinational corporations. A large-scale injection of public funding targeted specifically at Gaelic areas is theoretically possible, but unlikely in the extreme. Limited measures of this kind have been adopted in the Irish-speaking areas of Ireland, but political support for the language is much greater there than for Gaelic in Scotland.
Another difficulty is that economic development does not necessarily strengthen the position of a declining minority language. In theory, any new jobs in the Western Isles could be restricted to Gaelic speakers, but most residents of working age do not speak Gaelic. Such a policy would probably be hugely unpopular – bearing in mind that local Gaelic speakers usually have many non-Gaelic speaking relatives – and recruitment might prove difficult. Conversely, investment which leads to the development of new English-medium workplaces might tend to accelerate the spread of English in the community.
READ MORE: ‘All Highland schools should go Gaelic-first’, campaigners claim
A RELATED challenge is the shortage of affordable housing, driven by the combination of a generally low-wage local economy, a growing tourism sector and long-standing underinvestment in social housing.
These problems are found in many parts of Scotland, rural and urban. Here too a policy intervention specifically targeted at Gaelic-speaking areas is theoretically possible but highly unlikely.
Again, there would also be questions concerning the linguistic impact. In theory, new housing units could be restricted to Gaelic speakers, but many Gaelic speakers live with non-speakers, rendering such a policy difficult to implement. More importantly, many people would consider a linguistic restriction invidious and objectionable. In Sleat in Skye, where Gaelic is being regenerated by the Gaelic college Sabhal Mor Ostaig, proposals along these lines have been blocked in the wake of sharp controversy.
Given these obstacles, serious, programmatic thinking is needed to develop viable strategies to secure the language in the Western Isles. This is the most difficult strategic challenge facing Bord na Gaidhlig, the public body that co-ordinates Gaelic development in Scotland.
But the board is currently trying to cope with a more immediate crisis, as a highly critical report for Audit Scotland found profound failings in the governance and management of the organisation.
Crises can bring opportunities, however, and there is scope for a wide-ranging re-evaluation of Gaelic development strategy in Scotland, including strategy for the core Gaelic communities.
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Claim learning Gaelic first could 'disadvantage' pupils
The board was established under the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005, and after 15 years it may be time to re-examine the structure of this act and the key policy mechanisms it created. Careful, inclusive discussion is needed to take this evaluation forward. At the same time, unfortunately, Gaelic development is hindered by ignorance and negativity, not least in some elements of the media. The challenges are complex and saothair dha-riribh (serious work) is required.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel