THE DUP leader has made clear her party would not support a Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour government in a hung parliament.
At the launch of a policy document in Belfast, Arlene Foster claimed Corbyn would be bad for the future of the Union.
At an event that highlighted how the £1 billion secured by the DUP as part of its confidence and supply deal with the Conservatives had been spent in Northern Ireland, Foster predicted that the votes of her party’s MPs could again prove vital in deciding the make-up of the next government.
She insisted her party would not countenance a deal with Corbyn.
“A Jeremy Corbyn government would be bad for Northern Ireland and in a hung parliament we would not support him to be prime minister,” she said.
Foster rejected the suggestion that Corbyn might be a more attractive option than Boris Johnson, given the Labour leader wants to renegotiate the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal – an agreement the DUP is strongly opposed to.
“We are very clear that we will not be supporting a Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour Party in a government because we believe Jeremy Corbyn would not only be hugely detrimental to the United Kingdom in terms of the break-up of the United Kingdom, and we have heard the whole discussion around the Scottish independence referendum, and we would be very fearful for the economy of the United Kingdom and we would be very fearful for the defence of our United Kingdom on a global scale,” she said.
“So there are many, many reasons why we couldn’t in all consciousness (sic) support a Jeremy Corbyn-led administration.”
At the launch of the DUP’s policy plan titled Let’s Get NI Moving Again, Foster urged unionists to come out in numbers to support her party’s 17 candidates.
“The stakes could not be higher for Northern Ireland and its future direction,” she said.
“That is why every vote in every part of Northern Ireland will be vital to shaping the future.”
She added: “Make no mistake, elections matter.
“The outcome of this election across the United Kingdom is still uncertain. As we have proved over the last two years, our votes may well be crucial.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel