THE SNP have slammed a Labour Party claim that nearly half a million Scots would get a pay rise if they were in government.
Under plans to introduce a £10 per hour real living wage, Labour estimated that more than 130,000 workers aged between 18 and 24 – who earned less than the living wage last year – would benefit.
The party has also proposed a minimum income for students, free bus travel for under 25s, the banning of zero-hour contracts and a “Mary Barbour law” to control rent costs.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard said: “How can a young person pay their rent, never mind save for a deposit for a house, when they are getting paid less than the living wage? This needs to end, and Labour will take action in government.
“Labour will put more money in people’s pockets and bring real change to our economy so that it works for the many, not the few.”
But a Scottish minister refuted the claims, adding you “only have to look to Wales” to see what a vote for Labour “actually means”.
Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Business, Fair Work and Skills, said: “Labour have spent years opposing the devolution of employment powers to the Scottish Parliament, preferring instead to leave them in the hands of an austerity-driven UK Tory Government.
“The idea that people in Scotland cannot have improvements to their lives until the rest of the UK agrees to vote for a Labour government is a con that Scottish Labour have been trying to sell for years.
“The SNP has put fair work and supporting young people at the heart of our work in government – and as a result Scotland has the highest proportion of living wage earners anywhere in the UK.
“Support provided to students in further education has increased by a third since Labour were last in power and we are also increasing the care-experienced bursary to £8100 per year.
“We only have to look to Wales where Labour are the government to see what voting Labour actually means – fewer people earning the living wage than in Scotland, higher unemployment, students having to pay tuition fees and much more.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here