Scotland 's Constitutional Relations Secretary has said a second Brexit referendum including an option to remain should be held, even if agreement is reached on the Prime Minister's deal.
Mike Russell said if a compromise is found enabling a deal to pass, people across the UK should be given the chance to vote on it.
He said this referendum should include the option to remain in the EU.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, he said: "What I would want to see at this stage is either no Brexit - that's rescinding, revoking the Article 50 process - or, at the very least, a referendum on the choices before us.
"And the choice has to include revoking Article 50 and stopping this, because it's been the most enormous disaster, the most enormous, costly disaster.
Asked if a second referendum should still be held if a compromise is reached on Theresa May's Brexit deal before the current deadline of October 31, Russell replied: "Yes. People have the right to choose, they have the right to say they don't wish to do this.
"Things have changed enormously over the last three years and we also know that the original referendum was deeply flawed.
"I hope the Labour Party is in this position too in its discussions with the UK Government, because I don't think it could be conceived of now without giving people the chance to say what they thought."
Asked if he would accept the result of a second referendum, after Scotland voted 62% to remain and 38% to leave in 2016, he said: "If we got to the situation where Scotland continued to vote to stay in the EU and was being taken out against its will, nothing would have changed, that's quite clear."
He added: "I would not accept a situation where Scotland was taken out against her will, that would be impossible to do."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel