ANDREA Leadsom has suggested the Easter recess for Parliament could be cancelled to ensure MPs are working "flat out" to deal with Brexit.
The Commons Leader said time will be needed to either "find a way forward" or pass the necessary legislation required to implement Theresa May's Brexit deal should it be approved.
Leadsom said she would make further announcements about the recess dates, which prompted some MPs on the opposition benches to remark "recess is cancelled".
The break is scheduled to take place from when the Commons rises on April 4 until April 23.
Recess in February was cancelled due to concerns over the lack of progress on Brexit, although a vote during that week suggested some 250 of the 650 MPs were not in attendance due to existing commitments.
When asked by the SNP's Alison Thewliss about Easter, Leadsom replied: "I have announced the dates for Easter recess but, as is always the case, recess dates are announced subject to the progress of business.
"We will need time in the House either to find a way forward or to pass the Withdrawal Agreement Bill, and I think the country will rightly expect Parliament to be working flat out in either scenario, so further announcements on future recess dates will be announced in due course in the usual way."
READ MORE: Brexit: DUP to back Article 50 extension over Theresa May's deal
Leadsom earlier confirmed that MPs would debate the statutory instrument to change the exit day of the UK's withdrawal from the EU on Wednesday.
She added that the Prime Minister was having ongoing discussions "so that we can, if possible this week, approve the deal and guarantee Brexit".
Leadsom said: "The Government does continue to believe that the best way to leave the EU is with a deal, and the deal that she has negotiated has taken the best part of three years, is extremely complicated and it remains our view that it represents the best compromise for leaving the EU whilst keeping a close economic and security partnership.
"So, as the Prime Minister has said, she will continue to have discussions with colleagues across the House to seek to build support for her deal, so that we can if possible this week approve the deal and guarantee Brexit."
On the indicative votes procedure to test, SNP Commons leader Pete Wishart called on Leadsom to confirm that whatever outcomes were agreed on Wednesday "if there is a majority the Government will observe and respect it".
Leadsom replied: "At this stage we don't know which options will be debated and voted on, let alone which will pass."
She added: "Any options that are passed by this House must be negotiable, so they have to be deliverable in negotiations with the EU and they would also have to take account of how long those negotiations would take."
She said: "It would not be possible for different parties to accept proposals that their party manifestos rejected at the last general election.
"Well, the shadow Brexit secretary was clear in the House yesterday that Labour would reject certain potential outcomes as inconsistent with the Labour manifesto ... It's absolutely vital that this House delivers outcomes that are negotiable and are feasible and in line with the will of the manifestos and the referendum that we all stood on."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel