THE man behind Wings Over Scotland has told a court he was “absolutely horrified” to have been accused of homophobia by Labour MSP Kezia Dugdale.
Stuart Campbell is suing the former Scottish Labour leader for defamation over a column she wrote in the Daily Record referencing his “homophobic tweets”.
The tweet at the centre of the controversy states: “Oliver Mundell is the sort of public speaker that makes you wish his dad had embraced his homosexuality sooner.”
Giving evidence as the first witness in a civil proof at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, Campbell said he made the comment while live-tweeting the Conservative Party conference on March 3 2017.
He said it was “satirical criticism” of Scottish Conservative MSP Oliver Mundell’s public speaking skills.
Campbell, 51, from Bath, denied it was a homophobic reference to Scottish Secretary David Mundell being gay and agreed anyone who believed so was either “dishonest or stupid”.
Campbell said the tweet was a “joke”, the joke being: “I wish by some means or other you had not been fathered by your father.”
He added: “It’s a staple joke of humanity, I’d suggest, for almost as long as there has been language.”
In her Record column on March 7 2017, Dugdale wrote: “I was shocked and appalled to see a pro-independence blogger’s homophobic tweets during the Tory Party conference.”
She went on criticise any politicians who endorse those who “spout homophobia”.
Campbell denied being homophobic, saying he has always found discrimination against gay people “abhorrent”.
Asked for his reaction to Dugdale’s column by his lawyer, Craig Sandison QC, he said: “I remember being horrified and I spoke fairly quickly to my solicitor and suggested to him I considered that to be defamatory.”
Dugdale later brought up the matter at First Minister’s Questions in the Scottish Parliament, where she said her column had “called out Campbell for his homophobic comments”.
Campbell told the court: “I was absolutely horrified. It was a very unpleasant sensation to come
home and find you have been decried in such a way on live national television on a programme that may be watched by your family and friends. It was very unpleasant.”
He added: “I feel she has left me no option but to defend my reputation in this manner and the consequences of that I hold her significantly responsible for.”
Campbell said he was “offended” by media reports the day after the tweet, which included quotes from David Mundell, who came out as gay in 2016, that “inferred” the tweet was homophobic.
Roddy Dunlop QC, for Dugale, put to Campbell he was expressing in his tweet referencing Oliver Mundell the “outmoded view that gay people cannot be parents”.
Campbell said this was not the case. The lawyer asked: “When you are called out on something it’s only a joke?” Campbell replied: “No, of course not.”
Fellow pro-independence blogger Paul Kavanagh, 56, from Glasgow, who blogs as the Wee Ginger Dug, also gave evidence.
Unionist politicians view Campbell as “Satan”, he said, and being regarded as homophobic as a blogger would “destroy your credibility”.
Kavanagh, who came out as gay in the 1980s, said: “[The tweet] was crass, it was tasteless, it was insulting. It was meant to be all those things.
“It didn’t contain the sentiment that lesbian and gay people are less entitled to equality and that’s why I believe it wasn’t homophobic.”
Another witness, Stonewall Scotland director Colin Macfarlane, 42, told the court he believes the tweet was homophobic.
He said: “I think it was wholly unnecessary to reference David Mundell’s sexual orientation when the tweet was purported to be about Oliver Mundell’s public speaking abilities.”
Macfarlane said it used “sexual orientation as the punchline”, which showed a negative attitude towards gay people.
The case before Sheriff Nigel Ross continues on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here