THE SNP have said that the UK Government’s welfare system “simply isn’t working” after official figures revealed that 70% of claimants who challenged the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) over benefits decisions had their cases overturned.
More than two-thirds of people who faced losing their benefit payments were found to be fully entitled to them.
Government figures showed that of 51,256 appeal disposals in the quarter up to December 2018, 41,171 – 80% – were cleared after going to a hearing.
Of the cases cleared following a hearing, 70% ruled in favour of the claimant, marking a 5% increase from last year.
New DWP benefits schemes, such as the controversial Employment Support Allowance (ESA) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP), have contributed to the increase in case overturn rates, rising by 5% and 4% respectively on rates from October to December 2017.
SNP MSP Bob Doris raised concerns that the DWP’s welfare system suffered from “fundamental flaws”.
“These figures are extremely
concerning, and expose a system which should provide a safety net making too many mistakes,” he said.
“The UK Government’s welfare system simply isn’t working.”
Doris went on to suggest that vulnerable claimants could suffer and be left without basic staples.
“Appealing a decision can put undue stress on vulnerable people – who are in the meantime left out of pocket and potentially unable to afford basic essentials.
“For the DWP to get these cases so consistently wrong is appalling – it suggests systematic hostility and suspicion of people in need of help.
“It’s vital that these fundamental flaws in the current assessment and appeals process are addressed,” he said.
In response, a DWP spokesperson said: “Only a small proportion of all decisions are overturned at appeal, however our aim is for every person to feel they are treated fairly and we are improving how we support
disabled people.
“This includes integrating the service that delivers PIP assessments and Work Capability Assessments to improve the process for millions of people claiming health-related benefits.
“It is a matter for the Scottish Government how they assess entitlement for benefits once they are
devolved to them.”
According to the DWP, rulings on PIP and ESA cases are made after considering information provided by the claimant, which can include supporting evidence from their GP or medical specialist.
Since PIP was introduced, there have been some 3.7 million decisions made.
A total of 5% of those cases have been overturned on appeal.
Official DWP figures show that of approximately 3.9m decisions on ESA, 8% were appealed and 4% overturned.
The DWP also said that they are in the process of developing a single digital system to simplify the assessment process that delivers PIP assessments and Work Capability Assessments.
However, Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn MSP Doris added that the differences between the Westminster Government and the Scottish Government were stark.
“Westminster’s punitive approach to welfare is needlessly withdrawing support from those who need it most,” he said
“This highlights the difference in Scotland’s approach to developing a social security system based on
dignity, fairness and respect.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel