IT was the long-running equal pay dispute which the previous Labour council spent more than £2.5 million trying to fight – but yesterday Glasgow’s SNP administration reached a deal in principle to end it.
Susan Aitken, the leader of Glasgow City Council, confirmed the authority has “agreed an offer” with the organisations representing the thousands of workers affected.
The council stressed, however, that the £500m agreement is not the end of the process and a number of steps need to be taken before payments can be made.
Aitken said: “After a decade of obstruction and inaction, in a relatively short space of time we have now reached agreement which delivers the pay justice these women long have fought for.”
She said she is “proud to be able to recommend a settlement to right this historic injustice”.
Aitken had pledged to settle the historic dispute when she became the first SNP leader of the council in 2016.
She added: “It’s been a difficult journey but I have never once hesitated in my commitment to deliver pay justice in Glasgow.”
The agreement in principle comes after some 8000 Glasgow council workers walked out on strike for 48 hours in October last year in a bid to settle the pay claim.
Around 12,500 workers, mostly women, were proceeding with claims against the council following a Court of Session ruling in 2017 that female workers had been discriminated against.
The council adopted the Workforce Pay and Benefit Review (WPBR), implementing its job evaluation-based pay and grading system in 2006 with the aim of ensuring men and women received equal pay for jobs of the same value.
However, some women claim they were paid £3 an hour less than men in similarly graded roles.
Council bosses said at the time of the October strikes that such action was unnecessary, and they hoped to reach a settlement in the following months. Stefan Cross QC from Action4equality, which represented some of the claimants, said: “Since the strike there has been real and constructive negotiations.
“Neither side has got everything it wanted and both sides have made serious concessions so that we can both be satisfied that this is a fair deal.”
Before the payments can be made, the deal has to be approved by members of Glasgow City Council.
The authority is also “completing the process” of raising the necessary funding to cover the cost of the payments.
Wendy Dunsmore, regional industrial officer for the Unite union, hailed it as a “day of celebration for the workers in Glasgow City Council who were unfairly treated and discriminated against”.
She said: “These workers have been financially disadvantaged for years. The deal addresses these historic wrongs. Unite members will be delighted that the many years of wait is almost at an end.”
GMB Scotland organiser Hazel Nolan added: “This is a significant moment and is recognition of the value of women in this city, brought about by the women themselves understanding their own value and fighting for it together.
“What is important now is that the claimants and their families can have confidence in this agreement and in the process of delivery in the coming weeks and months.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel