THIS revival by Scottish Ballet of David Dawson’s 2016 staging of Tchaikovsky’s great ballet Swan Lake was announced with considerable fanfare.
Dawson’s piece certainly breaks radically with the tradition set by Lev Ivanov’s famous 1895 production in St Petersburg. However, one hesitates to endorse Scottish Ballet’s boast that this is a “Swan Lake for a new generation”.
For sure, John Otto’s set designs are characterised by a combination of cool, grey minimalism and occasional, bold post-industrialism (think large, pseudo-metallic lattice works that are reminiscent of the bigger engineering works of Scotland’s past).
Yumiko Takeshima’s costumes dovetail with Otto’s sets, opting for simple, 21st-century attire in pastels and shades of grey.
In visual terms, the production is, without question, about as far from the opulence of Tsarist Russia as it is possible to get.
However, Dawson offers in its stead a work of visual insipidness that lacks entirely the dynamism of modernity.
Here, Prince Siegfried and his blue-blooded pals seem like a band of Old Etonians who have all gone shopping in the same high-street clothing store. When Princess Odette and her friends are transformed into tutu-less swans, their lingerie-style attire looks like something Michelle Mone might have sold before she donned the ermine (and the full PPE outfit) and took to the benches of the House of Lords …
Dance is, of course, a sweaty business, but some of the fabrics selected here seem to have actually been designed to provide visual evidence of the perspiration of balletic exertion. Take, for instance, the early pas de deux between Siegfried and the white swan Odette.
Dawson transforms the scene from a fairytale vision into what looks like a late-night encounter between a sweat-soaked, male clubber and his half-dressed girlfriend.
This juddering conflict between the beauty of Tchaikovsky’s glorious score and the imagery on stage is typical of the production.
The problem here is not the show’s “modernity”, but its lack of conviction in its supposed modernism.
Sadly, Dawson displays little of the visual imagination of a great modernist choreographer such as Pina Bausch, Lloyd Newson or Michael Clark. Much of the dance here swings between classical ballet and contemporary dance, and, in doing so, it satisfies the demands of neither.
Which is a pity, as there are some lovely touches, such as the pleasing geometries of the first great swan scene.
The dancing itself is, as one would expect of Scottish Ballet, universally excellent, with Bruno Micchiardi impressing as Siegfried and Sophie Martin (Odette/Odile) all but stealing the show with a performance that is, paradoxically, as graceful as it is vigorous.
Thank goodness for the superb Scottish Ballet Orchestra (under the baton of Martin Yates). If the colour and vitality of their live playing were to be replaced by recorded music (as, depressingly, is the fate of Leeds-based Northern Ballet), this production would sink to deeper levels of disappointment.
As it is, however, one can’t help but feel that this revival is a mistake.
This Swan Lake is a failed experiment that would have been better left on the shelf.
Touring until May 4
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here