REWILDING is growing in popularity across Scotland, offering hope that some of the damage we have wrought on our nation’s natural heritage might be reversed, that the wilder aspects of life – which many find so inspiring – might be reawakened, and that native wildlife might be restored to more of its former abundance.
However, others have grown concerned that rewilding favours wilderness over people. For them, rewilding is associated with ‘green lairds’ and greenwashing, appearing to offer little more than a continuation of the injustices of concentrated land ownership and threatening to precipitate a new era of clearances.
Others are concerned that tourism – so often touted as an economic silver bullet – brings problems with littering, disturbance and traffic. Worse, the perception that tourism is contributing to a lack of affordable homes, forcing young people to leave their communities.
At the same time, the emergence of the carbon trading market has seen land prices skyrocket, placing land ownership ever further out of reach for ordinary people. Carbon trading isn’t the same thing as rewilding, but because rewilding can contribute to carbon sequestration, the two have become linked. Meanwhile, reservations about the merits of carbon offsetting persist.
READ MORE: Huge basking shark washes up on Scottish beach
It is important to emphasise that none of these concerns are really criticisms of rewilding itself. Rather, they are criticisms of how rewilding is being carried out in some cases, and very often, by who. In cattle farming, which is increasingly subject to its own criticisms, there is an expression: it’s the how, not the cow. Similarly, for rewilding, it might be observed that it’s the who, not the do, that is at the root of people’s scepticism.
Few people object to the goal of nature recovery, or even the need for natural capital to establish a recognised value for things we have undervalued for too long. However, what people do object to is not having a say, to not benefiting fairly from profits extracted from the landscapes they live in, and to having change forced upon them by remote, external forces.
Such concerns helped motivate a recent joint statement between Community Land Scotland and the Scottish Rewilding Alliance, calling for the land reform and rewilding movements to work together, to unite around common ground and help Scotland become a country where empowered communities and wild nature thrive together.
That is why rewilding in Scotland is focused on wildness, not wilderness. Wildness is not incompatible with people, only with the total subjugation of nature and the culture of human hegemony. Wildness means allowing nature to chart its own course, freeing it from artificial constraints, but it doesn’t set people apart from nature; rather it reconnects us with the natural world, our place within it and our reliance on it.
Indeed, restoring wildness to more of our land and seas – as called for by the Scottish Rewilding Alliance’s newly launched Rewilding Nation Charter – promises profound benefits for people as much as it does for nature, including improved health and wellbeing, more nature-based jobs and increased resilience to the growing threats from climate change.
Unsurprisingly then, there are a growing number of examples where rewilding is not just being informed by, but is being actively led by, local people. And perhaps nowhere is this trend more evident than within Scotland: The Big Picture’s Northwoods Rewilding Network. This is a nationwide community of landowners dedicated to rewilding principles, where one in five of the network’s land partners are now community-owned landholdings.
READ MORE: Sheep farmers say lynx reintroduction to Scotland would cause 'stress'
These are places like Tiroran on Mull, where regenerating native woodland provides educational and recreational amenity for both the local community and visitors, where a sawmill provides much-needed employment, and where the establishment of woodland crofts promises to help keep people in the landscape.
And these are places like Comrie Croft in Perthshire (below), where community shareholders laid the foundations for establishing the croft as a model of rural regeneration, or Glenan Wood in Argyll and Bute, where the community is organising the removal of invasive non-native species from a precious patch of Atlantic rainforest. And then there’s Uigshader on Skye, where locals are determined to restore nature in a way that benefits their community, with plans to host volunteer days and develop a modern clachan.
This is rewilding by the people, for the people, empowering communities, inspiring individuals and supporting local organisations to lead the way, demonstrating how rewilding can deliver a wilder, more sustainable future, with benefits for all of us.
Rewilding not only can deliver all these things; it must. Increasingly, it is.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here