Ricky Hatton made a successful 13th defence of his WBU light-welterweight title by defeating Argentinian Carlos Vilches on this day in 2004.
Hatton was pushed all the way to a points decision by his Argentinian opponent on a frustrating night at Manchester’s MEN Arena.
The result was never in doubt with the three ringside judges scoring 119-108 (twice), and 120-107 to give Hatton his 36th successive professional win.
But Hatton lacked a killer punch and admitted his performance was not good enough.
Hatton, then 25, said: “To be honest I felt really comfortable – never once did I not feel in control or losing my grip. But I felt flat and tired, it was an under-par performance.
“I don’t have too many bad nights but you can mark one down for tonight. That was a little bit below average.”
Hatton did drop Vilches to the canvas with a fine-looking left hook in round five but referee Darryl Ribbink deemed it a low blow and gave the challenger time to recover.
For the majority of the remainder of the contest Vilches hung on determinedly and largely succeeded in silencing another five-figure crowd.
Vilches looked determined to make a fight of it and dealt well with a cracking left uppercut from the champion midway through the first round.
Vilches got the chance to open up a little in the third but lacked the power in his punches to change the course of the contest.
For a moment in the fifth round Hatton appeared to have got his man but Vilches got up after his brief respite and hung on, firing a number of unpunished low blows of his own in the later rounds.
The crowd got on his back and cheered Hatton’s desperate attempts for a late knockout but the Englishman had to settle for a points win.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel