Eddie Jones rejects concerns that rugby’s current emphasis on defence is alienating prospective new fans as alarmist even though he accepts only purists will have enjoyed the Autumn Nations Cup.
England face a France team weakened by the unavailability of their best players in the tournament final at Twickenham on Sunday when it will be hoped that attacks finally ignite.
Workmanlike wins against Georgia, Ireland and Wales have established a seven-match winning run, but they have been founded on defence, set-piece and kicking, mirroring a wider trend in the game.
Disillusionment has grown over the lack of ambition, leading to fears that audiences will look elsewhere for entertainment. Jones, however, believes the sport will soon emerge from the doldrums.
“We go through cycles. The game is cyclical. We go through attack and defence cycles. And that’s the beauty of our game – it doesn’t sit still,” he said.
“So I think all of that sort of talk is massively alarmist and quite silly. The game evolves, changes, and we see it evolve and change all the time. I don’t agree with those comments.
“Just looking at rugby at the moment, it’s certainly a tough, physical game. A real game for the purists at the moment.
“It reminds me of the 2007 World Cup where defences were pretty dominant and kicking was one of the major ways to get ahead in the game.
“We go through these periods in the game. The next cycle is always an attacking one so let’s enjoy the defensive cycle we have at the moment and look forward to the attacking cycle when it comes.
“When that happens is always dependent on the laws – when we get quick ball we’re able to play with some space and some time.
“You just look at every side in the world now, they’re so much better organised in defence.
“Everyone’s getting off the line hard and time and space are at a premium. Unless we are able to get quick ball it’s very difficult to play with any fluency.”
A number of suggestions to inspire attack have been suggested, including reducing the points awarded for penalties and short-range tries, but for Jones the solution is to speed up the game.
“I have always said we need to make the game more fatiguing. We have too many stoppages in place,” he said.
“We have got Steve Price, the Warrington Wolves coach, in camp. He was talking about how in Super League their ball in play is 68 minutes, which is twice what it is in Test match rugby.
“Our ball-in-play time has been affected by the fact that the out-of-play time has increased because of HIAs, because of scrum setting, because of TMOs.
“Increasingly we are creating shorter periods of play and longer periods of rest and that does not produce any fatiguing effect in the game. We need that to come in to create some space.
“When you have got big guys – 120kg guys – if the ball in play is longer they are going to get fatigued and that means there’s going to be more space. That’s one way of getting a better balance in the game.”
Jones insists there is a lack of consistency from referees, but this is a result of the limitations caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
“One of the reasons why it is difficult at the moment is because referees aren’t getting together and there is a lack of face-to-face consolation of what we expect and what we need,” he said.
“Therefore we are getting quite wide variants of the way that the referees are applying the laws. And that is not contributing to the rugby maybe a lot of people want to see.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here