The League Cup could feature some under-23 teams in the future to help with player development and ease the fixture load on clubs involved in Europe, according to EFL chairman Rick Parry.
The controversial Project Big Picture proposals which leaked in October, and which received public backing from Parry, included the abolition of the League Cup alongside some other significant calendar changes, such as the reduction of the Premier League to 18 clubs.
Top-flight clubs swiftly rejected PBP, which was developed by Liverpool and Manchester United and was criticised for attempting to concentrate power in the hands of the top flight’s ‘big six’ clubs, in favour of continuing with the league’s own strategic review.
But the future of the second domestic knockout competition remains the subject of fierce debate.
Parry says there are “a myriad of possibilities” regarding the competition, with the game at European level set to undergo a significant revamp from 2024, but said scrapping it was far from a certainty.
He told the PA news agency: “It doesn’t mean we have to be in an environment where clubs in Europe are not participating at all, maybe we could see under-23 teams taking part because they’re looking for more competitive fixtures for developing players.
“Maybe other teams in the Premier League who are not in Europe will want to (continue to) take part, maybe it becomes an EFL-only competition, all of that is entirely speculative.
“But we have to be realistic in recognising that if we have 24 dates in the European calendar, there are going to be challenges.
“League Cups have been under threat in Europe for a very long time. I think we’re now the only country that has a second domestic (knockout) competition, they’re not terribly popular with UEFA, our European place has been downgraded.
“So I think with the 2024 changes in European competition there was always going to be a discussion to be had about the League Cup, there’s no question about that.”
UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin said in March it would be “better for everyone” if the competition was scrapped.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here