THE legacy will stand the test of time as well as the famous landmark that he was named after. On the track and off it, Rock of Gibraltar will forever be infamous as well as famous.
Racing fans would marvel at his majesty and will mourn his passing. For supporters of Manchester United, the former 2000 Guineas winner and fabled sire evokes contrasting memories and the fate and future of their club would have been very different had it not been for one of sports most controversial legal battles.
Rock of Gibraltar was owned by Sir Alex Ferguson and Sue Magnier, wife of then Old Trafford shareholder John Magnier, but the friendship soured upon the horse's retirement in 2003. A multi-million pound career in breeding awaited and Ferguson believed he was due a cut of the fees his prized possession would make in the years that followed.
The Coolmore operation run by Magnier disputed that fact and a chain of events that resulted in the breakdown of their relationship was put into motion. Unbeknown to United fans, it would ultimately end in the takeover of the club by the Glazer family.
Ferguson had to appeal to supporters not to disrupt the Cheltenham Festival in 2004, calling the event the 'equivalent of the FA Cup final to horse racing fans' as he pleaded for calm despite the brewing legal storm that would result in a reported £2.5million court settlement for the legendary boss.
Just a year later, Magnier and JP McManus sold their 28.89 per cent stake in United to Malcolm Glazer after raising concerns over the running of the club. It was a move that would lead to the American eventually purchasing a controlling interest at Old Trafford.
The rest, as they say, is history and it could all have been very different at Old Trafford. The name Rock of Gibraltar will always have a place in the annuls of sporting folklore.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here