TENNIS Australia has said it will leave the nation’s government to determine whether or not former world number one Novak Djokovic can enter the country ahead of January’s Australian Open.
The governing body has no plans to make any representations on behalf of Djokovic, who is unvaccinated against Covid-19 and subject to a three-year ban from entering Australia but can apply to immigration minister Andrew Giles for an exemption.
Earlier this year, Djokovic was deported from Australia days before the start of the Open as the Australian government ruled he may have disrupted civil order and his presence undermined the nation’s pandemic response.
At Wednesday’s launch for the 2023 Open, Tennis Australia chief executive Craig Tiley told reporters: “What we’re saying at this point is that Novak and the federal government need to work out the situation. And then we’ll follow any instruction after that.
“I did spend some time with Novak at the Laver Cup. We spoke generally. He said that he’d obviously love to come back to Australia, but he knows it’s going to be an ultimate decision for the federal government.
“He’s accepted that position. It’s a private matter between them. We’d like to welcome Novak back – he’s a nine-time champion.”
Tiley said the entry deadline for the tournament was in December and that Djokovic would need to have his eligibility determined by then.
Tiley also said that players from Russia and Belarus – who were banned from Wimbledon this summer – remained eligible to compete, although Russian players would not be able to represent their nation and instead play as independent athletes under a neutral banner.
“Like every other player they will have to go through a (visa) application process,” he said.
“The only difference would be that they cannot represent Russia, they cannot represent the flag of Russia, and they can’t participate in any activity such as (playing) the anthem of Russia, and have to play as independent players under a neutral (country) name.
“But they will be welcome to the Australian Open in January.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here