Jamie Murray and Joe Salisbury guaranteed there will be a British winner in the men’s doubles at this year’s US Open after they both reached the final with their respective partners.
Murray and Bruno Soares are into their first grand slam final since reuniting at the start of the year, with the 2016 victors of this competition edging out Australia’s John Peers and Slovakia’s Filip Polasek.
Under the roof of the Louis Armstrong Stadium, seventh seeds Murray and Soares rebounded from a second-set blip to prevail 6-3 3-6 6-4 against their eighth-seeded opponents in one hour and 41 minutes and set up a showdown against Salisbury and his American partner Rajeev Ram.
Jamie Murray, left, and Bruno Soares are into the US Open men’s doubles final (Seth Wenig/AP/PA)
It was an especially poignant triumph for Soares, who won at Flushing Meadows for a second time alongside Croatia’s Mate Pavic last year, as he had to undergo an appendectomy shortly after his arrival into Tokyo for the Olympics.
As well as missing the rearranged Games in Japan, the Brazilian only started training properly a couple of weeks before this event got under way, with Murray quipping afterwards: “The less he practises the better he plays.”
Soares said at courtside: “I’m very surprised to be honest. It wasn’t an easy ride. I just stayed patient, a lot of support from my team, my family and Jamie.
“We came here, we did the best we could and there was not much preparation, but we said ‘let’s get out and let’s fight, let’s have fun and fight’. That’s what we did and I think we improved a lot throughout the tournament, we’ve been getting better and better every round.”
Friday’s final will be Murray’s first in a grand slam men’s doubles event since going all the way with Soares in New York five years ago.
Joe Salisbury, right, and Rajeev Ram, left, will take on Murray and Soares in the final (Seth Wenig/AP/PA)
He added: “It’s been such a stop-start season for us for various things going on in our lives, especially Bruno.
“This is why we came back together, we wanted to win big tournaments, feeling like we can turn up and we’ve got a great chance to win. For us the opportunity to play in a grand slam final again is so exciting.”
The fourth-seeded pairing of Salisbury and Ram, who defeated Murray and Soares in the semi-finals of this year’s Australian Open, did not face a single break point and won their only one in a 7-6 (5) 6-4 victory over American wild cards Steve Johnson and Sam Querrey in one hour and 18 minutes.
The pair have been having an excellent season. While they were unable to defend their Australian Open crown after losing in the final in February, they have already qualified for the season-ending ATP Finals.
“We really try to focus on the big tournaments and be ready for that,” Salisbury said after he and Ram won in what was their fifth semi-final in the last seven major tournaments.
“I think we believe that we play our best tennis in the big moments, at the big tournaments.”
Second seed Alfie Hewett and fellow Briton Gordon Reid reached the semi-finals of the men’s wheelchair singles event.
French Open champion Hewett beat Frenchman Nicolas Peifer 7-5 6-2 and will face Argentine Gustavo Fernandez in the last four.
Paralympic bronze medallist Reid swept past Dutchman Tom Egberink 6-1 6-4 and will meet top seed Shingo Kunieda next.
Compatriot Jordanne Whiley overcame Japan’s Momoko Ohtani 6-1 5-7 6-3 in the women’s event.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel