SEVERAL years ago, I was carrying out my duties as head of delegation for the Scottish FA by accompanying the women’s national team on a trip to Greece where they were playing a couple of friendly games.
At this time there was very little coverage of the women’s national team, so I was surprised when I returned from training to find I had several missed calls from journalists wanting to speak to me.
But they weren’t after an update on the women’s team and their trip – rather a comment on a statement from Fifa president Sepp Blatter who had announced his thoughts on how we could get more people to follow women’s football. His statement was: “Let the women play in more feminine clothes like they do in volleyball – they could, for example, have tighter shorts.” He went on to add: “Female players are pretty, if you excuse me for saying so, and they already have some different rules to men – such as playing with a lighter ball.”
I am sure you can imagine my response, yet we still have the expectation that women and girls need to look pretty when they are participating in sport. In sports that have a marked system, it can sometimes count towards their overall score.
Recently, German gymnast Sarah Voss, competing at the European Artistic Gymnastics Championships, took a stand against sexualisation in her sport. Instead of the traditional leotard, she wore a one-piece which covered her legs. The following day, she was joined by two of her teammates.
A comment from Voss helps you understand the motivation: “As a little girl I didn’t see the tight outfits as such a big deal. But when puberty began, when my period came, I began feeling increasingly uncomfortable.”
You can see why we need to look at this situation from a different perspective. While I fully support a women’s cut for all sports kit, we must always ensure it does not sexualise the participant in any way.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here