The thing with sport these days is there are very few new ideas. Almost everything has already been tried and tested and either adopted, or discarded.
And so the news that a new mixed golf tournament, where men will compete against women for one single trophy, is not the first time this idea of a mixed tournament has been mooted.
This latest iteration will be a competition co-sanctioned by the European Tour and the Ladies European Tour which will take place in Stockholm next June and will be hosted by Swedish superstars of the game Henrick Stenson and Annika Sorenstam.
This new golf tournament is by no means the first time female athletes have been pitted against male. Over 40 years ago, Billie Jean King famously took on Bobby Riggs in the ‘Battle of the Sexes’. There are a number of sports such as motor racing which are generally not segregated. And even within golf, there has been a number of attempts by female athletes to beat men at their own game – Sorenstam was the first to enter men’s tournaments while more recently, Michelle Wie tried to make her mark in male fields.
Certainly, golf, which continuously struggles to shake off the reputation of being a game for middle-aged, middle-class white men, cannot be blamed for trying to come up with an idea which might attract a wider audience.
And with golf making it appear that shaking off the sexist tag is all but impossible, including men and women in the same competition is not the worst idea.
Yet the question persists; why do women need to compete directly against men at all?
Women’s golf, particularly in Europe, trails far behind men’s in terms of prize money, number of tour events and media coverage and so I’m not convinced the answer is to throw them in with the men.
Due to their biological advantages, male athletes, with very few exceptions, are physically superior to female athletes in terms of strength, power and speed. This means that nine times out of ten, their physical advantage means that the best male athletes in the world will beat the best female athletes.
There are some who look at women’s sport as inferior to men’s sport purely because men can run faster, throw further and jump higher.
This however, is a hugely reductive view of things.
Women should not have to defeat men in order to be valued in a sporting context. And if women’s sport continues along the lines that if they cannot beat men in head-to-head competitions then female athletes are of lesser value, we are fighting a losing battle when it comes to women’s sport gaining greater credibility.
The path to greater recognition for female sports and female athletes is not to continue to try to beat men. First of all, in the majority of cases, it is unlikely to be successful. And second of all, it is missing the point. Female sport should be valued for what it is, and not derided because the athletes are a few paces slower than their male counterparts.
Do not try to persuade me that Laura Muir’s 1500m exploits over the past few years have been any less thrilling to watch just because she is running a few seconds slower than the best male runners at the same distance.
It remains to be seen whether Stenson and Sorenstam’s new tournament is a success. It may well be. But in an attempt to increase the value of women’s sport, mixed tournaments should not become the norm.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel