BRENDAN Rodgers has accused Craig Levein of being "obsessed" with Scott Brown after he had another dig at the Celtic skipper.
The former Scotland manager suggested Brown had got himself deliberately booked against Kilmarnock on Saturday to ensure he served a suspension before Celtic face Rangers on March 11.
Levein's latest comments came after Brown had claimed that his yellow card was down to his former Scotland manager's jibe that "everybody should get a little bit more protection from Scott Brown".
Rodgers said: "He is a wee bit obsessed with Browny, isn't he?
"I think it is a huge compliment for Browny that Craig keeps talking about him, if he does, especially as we don't play them for a little while.
"Browny is a very competitive player. There is nothing really to answer on that."
Asked how comfortable he was with other managers speaking about his players in public, he said: "It is not something that any manager likes so much. It is not something I do unless I am praising a player for his qualities. It is each to their own."
The row started after Celtic's recent midweek victory over Hearts when Levein hit out over Brown's challenge on Harry Cochrane, which left the 16-year-old with a collarbone injury, and accused him of seeking out the midfielder in response to Celtic's 4-0 defeat at Tynecastle in December.
After the Celtic midfielder was booked against Kilmarnock last week – which rules him out of this month's visit of St Johnstone to Celtic Park – Brown retorted: "He has done his job, hasn't he? I was booked with my first foul and I think that is exactly what Craig was looking to do."
Brown will be free to play in Saturday's William Hill Scottish Cup tie against Partick Thistle and Rodgers is confident his side will bounce back from the 1-0 Ladbrokes Premiership loss to Kilmarnock, which was only his second defeat by Scottish opposition since he took over at Celtic in 2016.
He said: "I was disappointed after the game, I thought we could have done more despite the pitch and everything else.
"But I have to defend the players as well, it is an horrendous surface to play on.
"I have said [that] when we have won there. It is one of those things that can happen."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here