BIRMINGHAM is still waiting to be officially endorsed as host city of the 2022 Commonwealth Games despite remaining the only public bidder.
The Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) said it is close to confirming the replacement for Durban, which was stripped in March, but “require(s) further clarification on a range of issues”.
Birmingham thought it had won the race to stage the Games in September when the city emerged as the only bidder – only for the CGF to deem its bid not “fully compliant”.
The extended deadline for further bids or expressions of interest passed last week with no more evident developments despite the CGF claiming to have examined bids or prospective bids from as many as eight cities.
Although Birmingham remains the overwhelming favourite to host the 2022 event, this week’s news will come as a blow to their hopes of beginning their relatively short cycle as official host city.
It is believed the CGF’s reluctance to confirm the move is related to a desire for clarification of government guarantees – one of the main reasons why the Durban bid floundered in March.
In a statement following a meeting of the 2018 Commonwealth Games Coordination Commission on the Gold Coast, the CGF said: “It is essential that we have fully examined all aspects of the cities’ bid submissions and expressions of interest, and that we are fully satisfied that the ultimate host for 2022 is capable of staging a Games that fully delivers for Commonwealth athletes and host communities.
“The CGF is close to making a decision to select the host city of the 2022 Games. We thank all nations who have participated in the process.
The CGF is confident that we will make a final decision regarding the selection of a host city for 2022 before the year-end.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here