SINCE I’m just back from a week visiting friends in France – weather gey dreich throughout – it seems appropriate to kick off with one of my favourite French sayings which roughly translates as “the more things change, the more they remain the same.”
That more or less sums up my feelings on returning to the circular debate about independence, conventions, referenda, elections general and other and the usual social media mix of trollers, conspiracy theorists, and time-served hecklers.
The more things change, the more they remain the same right enough. Though let’s hope that never becomes an epitaph for independence dreams.
I see that those of us who have long been impatient with indy life in the slow lane have now been labelled frustrated radicals by one of my colleagues. Frankly my dears, at my age and stage that’s no mean compliment.
Though I prefer to think of us as pragmatists: if you find you are banging on a firmly locked, barred and bolted door, maybe it’s time to check out other exits.
That’s why I wonder about the terms of reference for next month’s SNP convention which seem to perpetuate the fantasy that after these many years of fruitless search, a “legally binding” solution will pop out of the woodwork. Or cuddly ol’ Westminster will have a Damascene conversion to basic democracy.
I get that political entities are perfectly entitled to talk to their own members to the exclusion of other interested parties in terms of a very specific, policy determining, gathering. But maybe it ought not to be to the exclusion of other route maps on its agenda.
Neither do I resile from the view that while all those committed to Scottish independence (as opposed to the fair-weather variety) need to be part of the solution, it’s also true that the main party favouring independence still has the numerical parliamentary clout which is also a prerequisite of success.
Alba has yet to win a seat under its own colours, and whether or not you agree with its policy positions – I do on GRR for instance – it is in no danger of becoming the largest single player at Holyrood any time soon. Or, more likely, ever.
As for Scottish Labour, it can barely contain it’s excitement given the latest polling predictions. It’s desperate to woo back defectors from the SNP and its game plan is to try and unite the anti Tories under a Labour banner.
READ MORE: SNP issue 'defend devolution' challenge to Labour and Tories
I fear it speaks with forked tongue. Whilst many certainly crossed the floor to the SNP because of Labour’s anti-independence, anti-referendum stance, some of the leavers also looked at the modern Labour party and wondered where it had mislaid its soul.
It’s not so much that Labour have become Red Tories as the sloganising has it, but that it has abandoned its own founding principles. A people’s party which scorns the people.
Many of the UK Labour leader’s pledges when a candidate for the top job have met a nasty end in the shredder. And, to be fair, the landscape has changed out of recognition in the intervening years, so some re-configuration is not automatically out of order.
That might excuse a U-turn on higher taxes for the very wealthy, but it’s hardly an alibi for refusing to quantify and rail against the damage done by Brexit, not least to our own indigenous fishing and seafood industries. Both Starmer and his shadow chancellor are wont to intone that Brexit is yesterday’s news, done and dusted, and the game plan is now to make it work.
Precisely how you make a castastrophic act of self harm into a glowing opportunity is a fantasy worthy of Farage himself, though even that multi party demagogue has recanted, Which leaves the Labour front bench as the only team still believing in a healthy life after Brexit.
Meanwhile, instead of nationalising some public utilities as promised, we now have “regulating the market”. That’ll work for sure! Instead of supporting union demands for fair pay and conditions, there’s a ban on shadow cabinet members being caught within a country mile of a picket line.
And where is the outrage over the basic right of protest being binned by an out-of-control Home Secretary?
Where is the pushback on migration policy? Some statements from the Labour front bench seem more concerned that the government aren’t getting numbers down fast enough rather than being vocally appalled at unspeakable initiatives like Rwandan deportations.
Why has the proposed abolition of universal credit morphed into “reform of”. Weasily, meaningless terminology.
Unlike some colleagues, I’m not party to the Jeremy Corbyn nostalgiafest. I thought him a decent man with many decent qualities who had as much chance of being voted Prime Minister as I have of becoming the Kirk Moderator.
It is certainly true that Sir Keir needs all the MPs he can muster to get rid of an utterly corrupt and malign Tory administration. It is also true that any new Scottish Labour MP’s will have signed up to an anti-independence programme. They will not be on our side, folks.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: 'I literally had no idea who Alister Jack was'
Worse still they will be charged with re-inforcing and protecting the Union.
Plus, as another columnist pointed out last week, only four times in the last 105 years has Scotland got the UK Government it voted for. And now, with our population decline and England’s expanding one, our representation in the Commons is ever more impotent.
In which regard we might also ponder that a smaller number of SNP MPs in the Commons will have even less clout than the current incumbents, which is not saying very much at all really.
When I suggest that many of their tribe would be rather more usefully deployed north of the border, the usual riposte is that “yes but they are there to represent all their constituents”.
Maybe so, but there will have been gey few Unionist votes in their pile at the count. And the pro-Indy voters didn’t dispatch them to the Commons because they liked the colour of their eyes.
We have missed many tipping points where more, dare I say radical, action would have garnered more concessions. We have failed to mount a proper attack on the internal market act which was specifically designed to empower Westminster further and destabilise the already shoogly foundations of the devolution settlement.
We have been altogether too quiescent when naked bribery was used to bypass Holyrood and, frankly, too bloody forelock touching altogether – which is a clever anatomical trick when you are being simultaneously booted up the backside.
The Smith commission, which many Labour-supporting scribes are fond of flagging up as supposed evidence of Labour largesse to Scotland, specifically says that none of the Smithsonian clauses prevent Scotland seceding if the people so will it.
Cast an eye towards Ireland where unification seems a prospect nearer than ever. Where the UK Government says any poll to determine that end can be held every seven years. What you might call a political generation!
Ireland, where the northern dinosaurs are being successively drubbed as the electorate want their ba’ back. Where the current UK Prime Minister had the gall to suggest in public that Northern Ireland with access to the EU and the UK had “the best of both worlds”!
Ireland, which itself faced many teething problems post-independence but contrived latterly to re-invent itself as a socially progressive, economically sound, serious player on the world stage. Bolstered by the constant support of its EU partners. The ones the UK abandoned. The ones we voted to hang on to.
Let’s wake up and smell the future.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel